CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Live
LeaderboardModelsCompareStacksBest ofGuidesNewsMethod
…
CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Precision Benchmarks

Programmatic, dated AI model benchmarks, head-to-head comparisons, and Stack Engine presets.

Daily ingest · 06:00 UTC

Analytics & Benchmarks

  • AI Model Leaderboard
  • Head-to-Head Compare Hub
  • Models Directory
  • Stack Engine Presets
  • Frontier Models
  • Open Weights Catalog

Guides & Intent Lists

  • Best LLM Lists (2026)
  • Best Coding LLM
  • Best Cheap LLM
  • Fastest Low-Latency LLM
  • Claude vs GPT Benchmark
  • What is Elo?
  • Methodology Guides
  • News & Dispatches

Transparency & API

  • Evaluation Methodology
  • Benchmark Changelog
  • Public JSON API
  • llms.txt Specification
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sign In / Account

© 2026 CompareLLM. Public benchmark data aggregated from Arena Elo, LiveBench, SWE-bench & OpenRouter.

Every score has a dated snapshot.

  1. Home
  2. Comparisons
  3. Gemini 3 Flash vs Qwen3.8 27B

Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 16, 2026

Gemini 3 Flash vs Qwen3.8 27B benchmark

This page compares Gemini 3 Flash (Google) and Qwen3.8 27B (Alibaba) using the latest snapshots we have as of Aug 16, 2026. On preference Elo, Gemini 3 Flash is ahead by 97 points (1,495 vs 1,398; seed-bootstrap (Aug 1, 2026)). On SWE-bench coding, Gemini 3 Flash resolves 75.8% versus 58.8% (seed-bootstrap (Aug 1, 2026)). Gemini 3 Flash streams faster (190 tok/s) while Gemini 3 Flash is the cheaper output token ($3/1M). Gemini 3 Flash has the larger context window (1M tokens). Every cell below is a dated snapshot from a named public source — we do not invent missing scores, and we do not run SWE-bench ourselves.

Quick answer

Gemini 3 Flash vs Qwen3.8 27B is a dated snapshot, not a lab score. Gemini 3 Flash leads preference Elo (1,495 vs 1,398). Gemini 3 Flash leads SWE-bench coding. Gemini 3 Flash is the cheaper output token. Elo is crowd preference, not an exam. Pick the column that matches the job.
Share Analysis:
WhatsAppTelegramX / PostLinkedInReddit

Google

Gemini 3 Flash

Fast Google frontier-adjacent model. Near-top official SWE-bench at a fraction of Opus price.

Elo 1,495$3/1M out

Alibaba

Qwen3.8 27B

Alibaba open-weight 27B drop dated Aug 14 2026. Dense enough to self-host; not a frontier MoE.

Elo 1,398$3.1999999999999997/1M out

Swap or Add Any Model to this Matchup

Instant pairwise benchmark recalculation across 400+ LLMs

Model A
Model B
Quick vs:vs Claude Opus 4.5vs Claude Opus 4.6vs Claude Sonnet 4.5vs Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Interactive Comparison Diagram

Matchup Breakdown

Tug-of-War Matchup Matrix

Category wins across intelligence, speed, and pricing efficiency.

Gemini 3 Flash (9)vsQwen3.8 27B (1)
Gemini 3 Flash: 9W (90%)Overall: Gemini 3 FlashQwen3.8 27B: 1W (10%)
← Gemini 3 FlashQwen3.8 27B →
Gemini 3 Flash (5/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Preference Elo
1,495vs1,398
Coding Elo
1,510vs1,422
SWE-bench
75.8%vs58.8%
LiveBench
66.8%vs60.6%
GPQA Diamond
78.4%vs73.4%
Gemini 3 Flash: 5WQwen3.8 27B: 0W
Gemini 3 Flash (2/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Output speed
190 tok/svs152 tok/s
Time to first token
95 msvs140 ms
Gemini 3 Flash: 2WQwen3.8 27B: 0W
Gemini 3 Flash (2/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Output price
$3/1Mvs$3.2/1M
Input price
$0.5/1Mvs$0.45/1M
Context window
1Mvs262k
Gemini 3 Flash: 2WQwen3.8 27B: 1W
Capability Matchup Radar

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Each spoke is a skill. Farther from the center is better (0–100th percentile). Tap any dot to inspect details.

Tap any node to inspect
Percentile 0–100
Dimensional AdvantageGemini 3 Flash 6/6
Preference Elo

Gemini 3 Flash

97 pts advantage

Throughput Speed

Gemini 3 Flash

38 tok/s faster

Price Efficiency

Gemini 3 Flash

$0.20/1M cheaper

Full Benchmark Score Matrix

—
Elo
High is better
+7%1,495
EloHigh is better
1,398
Code Elo
High is better
+6%1,510
Code EloHigh is better
1,422
LiveBench
High is better
+10%66.8%
LiveBenchHigh is better
60.6%
SWE-bench
High is better
+29%75.8%
SWE-benchHigh is better
58.8%
GPQA
High is better
+7%78.4%
GPQAHigh is better
73.4%
TTFT
Low is better
+47%95 ms
TTFTLow is better
140 ms
Speed
High is better
+25%190 tok/s
SpeedHigh is better
152 tok/s
In $
Low is better
$0.5/1M
In $Low is better
$0.45/1M+11%
Out $
Low is better
+7%$3/1M
Out $Low is better
$3.2/1M
Context
High is better
+300%1M
ContextHigh is better
262k
Interactive Simulator

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs based on published $/1M tokens.

Save up to 2% with Gemini 3 Flash
Monthly Volume50M tokens/mo
Quick Presets:
Token Ratio (In vs Out)70% In / 30% Out
RAG / Search (10% out)Coding / Chat (50% out)
Gemini 3 Flash$62.50 / mo
In: $17.50Out: $45.00
Qwen3.8 27B$63.75 / mo
In: $15.75Out: $48.00
Estimated Cost Delta

Gemini 3 Flash is estimated to save $1.25/month ($15/year).

Based on 50M tokens (30% gen)

Key Selection Recommendations

  • 1
    Gemini 3 Flash:Pick Gemini 3 Flash when repo-level coding accuracy is the constraint.
  • 2
    Gemini 3 Flash:Pick Gemini 3 Flash when time-to-first-token matters more than peak Elo.
  • 3
    Gemini 3 Flash:Pick Gemini 3 Flash for million-token RAG or long-document jobs.

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsGemini 3 Flash

Higher SWE-bench (75.8%).

High-volume chatGemini 3 Flash

Lower output list price ($3/1M).

Voice / low-latency UIGemini 3 Flash

Lower TTFT (95 ms).

Long-document RAGGemini 3 Flash

Larger window (1M).

Screenshots / visionGemini 3 Flash

Gemini 3 Flash is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Target WorkloadRecommended PickEvaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agentsGemini 3 FlashHigher SWE-bench (75.8%).
High-volume chatGemini 3 FlashLower output list price ($3/1M).
Voice / low-latency UIGemini 3 FlashLower TTFT (95 ms).
Long-document RAGGemini 3 FlashLarger window (1M).
Screenshots / visionGemini 3 FlashGemini 3 Flash is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Related Editorial Dispatches & Benchmark Notes

View all news
launchAug 14, 2026

Qwen3.8 27B (Aug 14): dense enough to self-host, not a frontier MoE

Alibaba open-weight 27B drop. Local/open-weight lists should see it. It will not win frontier-agents.

launchMar 16, 2026

Gemini 3 Flash: near-top official SWE-bench at a fraction of Opus

March 2026 speed SKU. Still a useful cheap-coding compare even after 3.6/3.7 Flash.

Community Sentiment

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

Sign in to cast your verified vote, bookmark models, and participate in benchmark discussions.Sign In to Post

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Share card

The real PNG is generated at /compare/gemini-3-flash-vs-qwen-3-8-27b/opengraph-image for crawlers.

PNG

CompareLLM Matrix

Verified head-to-head card

LIVE
VS
Google

Gemini 3 Flash

Elo 1,495
LiveBench66.8%
SWE-bench75.8%
Speed190 tok/s
Output cost$3/1M
Alibaba

Qwen3.8 27B

Elo 1,398
LiveBench60.6%
SWE-bench58.8%
Speed152 tok/s
Output cost$3.2/1M

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, Gemini 3 Flash or Qwen3.8 27B?
Gemini 3 Flash has the higher preference Elo in our latest snapshot (1,495). “Better” still depends on coding, price, and latency — see the table.
Which is better at coding, Gemini 3 Flash or Qwen3.8 27B?
Gemini 3 Flash leads SWE-bench at 75.8% vs 58.8%. SWE-bench is one harness, not your repo.
Which is cheaper to run in production?
Gemini 3 Flash output tokens are $3/1M versus $3.2/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.
Which is faster, Gemini 3 Flash or Qwen3.8 27B?
Gemini 3 Flash has the lower time-to-first-token (95 ms vs 140 ms). Tokens/sec is a separate column if you care about long completions.
Which has the larger context window?
Gemini 3 Flash accepts 1M tokens versus 262k.
Can I self-host either model?
Qwen3.8 27B is marked open-weights in our catalog. The other side is a closed API. Check the provider license before you ship weights.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?
No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?
Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. Gemini 3 Flash and Qwen3.8 27B Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Related news

  • launch · Aug 14, 2026

    Qwen3.8 27B (Aug 14): dense enough to self-host, not a frontier MoE

  • launch · Mar 16, 2026

    Gemini 3 Flash: near-top official SWE-bench at a fraction of Opus

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All Gemini 3 Flash matchups →|All Qwen3.8 27B matchups →
Gemini 3 Flash vs Gemini 2.5 Flash (previous gemini-flash)Gemini 3 Flash vs Gemini 3.6 Flash (next gemini-flash)Qwen3.8 27B vs Qwen 3 Max (previous qwen)Qwen QwQ 32B vs Gemini 3 FlashGemini 2.0 Flash Thinking vs Gemini 3 FlashQwen 3 Max vs Gemini 3 Flash