Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 17, 2026noindex (thin pair)
This page compares Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B (free) (Google) and MiniMax M2.5 (MiniMax) using the latest snapshots we have as of Aug 17, 2026. Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B (free) wins on output price at $0/1M. Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B (free) has the larger context window (262k tokens). Every cell below is a dated snapshot from a named public source — we do not invent missing scores, and we do not run SWE-bench ourselves.
Auto-discovered from OpenRouter (google/gemma-4-26b-a4b-it:free). Preview until a second source matches.
MiniMax
MiniMax M2.5MiniMax coding model. Tied near the top of official SWE-bench bash-only in Feb 2026.
Instant pairwise benchmark recalculation across 400+ LLMs
Category wins across intelligence, speed, and pricing efficiency.
Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy
Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness
Cost per million tokens and max context window length
Each spoke is a skill. Farther from the center is better (0–100th percentile). Tap any dot to inspect details.
No shared data
No shared data
$0.90/1M cheaper
Need SWE-bench on both sides.
Lower output list price ($0/1M).
Need TTFT on both sides.
Larger window (262k).
MiniMax M2.5 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.
| Target Workload | Recommended Pick | Evaluation Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Repo / coding agents | insufficient data | Need SWE-bench on both sides. |
| High-volume chat | Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B (free) | Lower output list price ($0/1M). |
| Voice / low-latency UI | insufficient data | Need TTFT on both sides. |
| Long-document RAG | Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B (free) | Larger window (262k). |
| Screenshots / vision | MiniMax M2.5 | MiniMax M2.5 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog. |
No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!
The real PNG is generated at /compare/gemma-4-26b-a4b-it-free-vs-minimax-m2-5/opengraph-image for crawlers.
Verified head-to-head card
