CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Live
LeaderboardModelsCompareStacksBest ofGuidesNewsMethod
…
CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Precision Benchmarks

Programmatic, dated AI model benchmarks, head-to-head comparisons, and Stack Engine presets.

Daily ingest · 06:00 UTC

Analytics & Benchmarks

  • AI Model Leaderboard
  • Head-to-Head Compare Hub
  • Models Directory
  • Stack Engine Presets
  • Frontier Models
  • Open Weights Catalog

Guides & Intent Lists

  • Best LLM Lists (2026)
  • Best Coding LLM
  • Best Cheap LLM
  • Fastest Low-Latency LLM
  • Claude vs GPT Benchmark
  • What is Elo?
  • Methodology Guides
  • News & Dispatches

Transparency & API

  • Evaluation Methodology
  • Benchmark Changelog
  • Public JSON API
  • llms.txt Specification
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sign In / Account

© 2026 CompareLLM. Public benchmark data aggregated from Arena Elo, LiveBench, SWE-bench & OpenRouter.

Every score has a dated snapshot.

  1. Home
  2. Comparisons
  3. GPT-5 vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5

Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 16, 2026

GPT-5 vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 benchmark

This page compares GPT-5 (OpenAI) and MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 (Moonshot) using the latest snapshots we have as of Aug 16, 2026. On preference Elo, GPT-5 is ahead by 43 points (1,558 vs 1,515; seed-bootstrap (Aug 1, 2026)). On SWE-bench coding, MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 resolves 71.3% versus 68.4% (seed-bootstrap (Aug 1, 2026)). GPT-5 streams faster (78 tok/s) while MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 is the cheaper output token ($2.85/1M). GPT-5 has the larger context window (400k tokens). Every cell below is a dated snapshot from a named public source — we do not invent missing scores, and we do not run SWE-bench ourselves.

Quick answer

GPT-5 vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 is a dated snapshot, not a lab score. GPT-5 leads preference Elo (1,558 vs 1,515). MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 leads SWE-bench coding. MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 is the cheaper output token. Elo is crowd preference, not an exam. Pick the column that matches the job.
Share Analysis:
WhatsAppTelegramX / PostLinkedInReddit

OpenAI

GPT-5

OpenAI flagship reasoning model for 2025–26. Strong general preference Elo and multimodal coverage.

Elo 1,558$10/1M out

Moonshot

MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5

Auto-discovered from OpenRouter (moonshotai/kimi-k2.5). Preview until a second source matches.

Elo 1,515$2.8499999999999996/1M out

Swap or Add Any Model to this Matchup

Instant pairwise benchmark recalculation across 400+ LLMs

Model A
Model B
Quick vs:vs Claude Opus 4.5vs Claude Opus 4.6vs Claude Sonnet 4.5vs Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Interactive Comparison Diagram

Matchup Breakdown

Tug-of-War Matchup Matrix

Category wins across intelligence, speed, and pricing efficiency.

GPT-5 (5)vsMoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 (5)
GPT-5: 5W (50%)Overall: Even matchupMoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5: 5W (50%)
← GPT-5MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 →
GPT-5 (3/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Preference Elo
1,558vs1,515
Coding Elo
1,540vs1,520
SWE-bench
68.4%vs71.3%
LiveBench
69.8%vs67.2%
GPQA Diamond
85.2%vs87.6%
GPT-5: 3WMoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5: 2W
Tied (1/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Output speed
78 tok/svs72 tok/s
Time to first token
290 msvs270 ms
GPT-5: 1WMoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5: 1W
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 (2/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Output price
$10/1Mvs$2.85/1M
Input price
$1.25/1Mvs$0.57/1M
Context window
400kvs262k
GPT-5: 1WMoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5: 2W
Capability Matchup Radar

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Each spoke is a skill. Farther from the center is better (0–100th percentile). Tap any dot to inspect details.

Tap any node to inspect
Percentile 0–100
Dimensional AdvantageEven 3–3
Preference Elo

GPT-5

43 pts advantage

Throughput Speed

GPT-5

6 tok/s faster

Price Efficiency

MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5

$7.15/1M cheaper

Full Benchmark Score Matrix

—
Elo
High is better
+3%1,558
EloHigh is better
1,515
Code Elo
High is better
+1%1,540
Code EloHigh is better
1,520
LiveBench
High is better
+4%69.8%
LiveBenchHigh is better
67.2%
SWE-bench
High is better
68.4%
SWE-benchHigh is better
71.3%+4%
GPQA
High is better
85.2%
GPQAHigh is better
87.6%+3%
TTFT
Low is better
290 ms
TTFTLow is better
270 ms+7%
Speed
High is better
+8%78 tok/s
SpeedHigh is better
72 tok/s
In $
Low is better
$1.25/1M
In $Low is better
$0.57/1M+119%
Out $
Low is better
$10/1M
Out $Low is better
$2.85/1M+251%
Context
High is better
+53%400k
ContextHigh is better
262k
Interactive Simulator

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs based on published $/1M tokens.

Save up to 68% with MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5
Monthly Volume50M tokens/mo
Quick Presets:
Token Ratio (In vs Out)70% In / 30% Out
RAG / Search (10% out)Coding / Chat (50% out)
GPT-5$193.75 / mo
In: $43.75Out: $150.00
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5$62.70 / mo
In: $19.95Out: $42.75
Estimated Cost Delta

MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 is estimated to save $131.05/month ($1,573/year).

Based on 50M tokens (30% gen)

Key Selection Recommendations

  • 1
    MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5:Pick MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 when repo-level coding accuracy is the constraint.
  • 2
    MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5:Pick MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 when time-to-first-token matters more than peak Elo.
  • 3
    GPT-5:Pick GPT-5 as the default general assistant.

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsMoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5

Higher SWE-bench (71.3%).

High-volume chatMoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5

Lower output list price ($2.85/1M).

Voice / low-latency UIMoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5

Lower TTFT (270 ms).

Long-document RAGGPT-5

Larger window (400k).

Screenshots / visionGPT-5

Both accept images. Defaulting to the higher-Elo side (GPT-5).

Target WorkloadRecommended PickEvaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agentsMoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5Higher SWE-bench (71.3%).
High-volume chatMoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5Lower output list price ($2.85/1M).
Voice / low-latency UIMoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5Lower TTFT (270 ms).
Long-document RAGGPT-5Larger window (400k).
Screenshots / visionGPT-5Both accept images. Defaulting to the higher-Elo side (GPT-5).

Related Editorial Dispatches & Benchmark Notes

View all news
launchAug 8, 2025

GPT-5 (2025) remains the legacy OpenAI flagship baseline

Still a common compare target. 5.6 Sol replaced it as the buy; GPT-5 stays for old URLs.

Community Sentiment

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

Sign in to cast your verified vote, bookmark models, and participate in benchmark discussions.Sign In to Post

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Share card

The real PNG is generated at /compare/gpt-5-vs-kimi-k2-5/opengraph-image for crawlers.

PNG

CompareLLM Matrix

Verified head-to-head card

LIVE
VS
OpenAI

GPT-5

Elo 1,558
LiveBench69.8%
SWE-bench68.4%
Speed78 tok/s
Output cost$10/1M
Moonshot

MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5

Elo 1,515
LiveBench67.2%
SWE-bench71.3%
Speed72 tok/s
Output cost$2.85/1M

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, GPT-5 or MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5?
GPT-5 has the higher preference Elo in our latest snapshot (1,558). “Better” still depends on coding, price, and latency — see the table.
Which is better at coding, GPT-5 or MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5?
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 leads SWE-bench at 71.3% vs 68.4%. SWE-bench is one harness, not your repo.
Which is cheaper to run in production?
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 output tokens are $2.85/1M versus $10/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.
Which is faster, GPT-5 or MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5?
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 has the lower time-to-first-token (270 ms vs 290 ms). Tokens/sec is a separate column if you care about long completions.
Which has the larger context window?
GPT-5 accepts 400k tokens versus 262k.
Can I self-host either model?
Neither model is marked open-weights here. You are comparing hosted APIs.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?
No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?
Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. GPT-5 and MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Related news

  • launch · Aug 8, 2025

    GPT-5 (2025) remains the legacy OpenAI flagship baseline

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All GPT-5 matchups →|All MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 matchups →
GPT-5 vs GPT-4.5 Orion (previous gpt-flagship)GPT-5 vs GPT-5.6 Sol (next gpt-flagship)MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711 (previous kimi)MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 vs Kimi K3 (next kimi)GPT-5.6 Terra vs GPT-5OpenAI: o3 Mini vs GPT-5