Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 16, 2026

Grok 4.6 vs Llama 4 Scout benchmark

Name: Grok 4.6 vs Llama 4 Scout AI benchmark comparison
Creator: CompareLLM
License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

This page compares Grok 4.6 (xAI) and Llama 4 Scout (Meta) using the latest snapshots we have as of Aug 16, 2026. On preference Elo, Grok 4.6 is ahead by 180 points (1,592 vs 1,412; seed-bootstrap (Aug 16, 2026)). On SWE-bench coding, Grok 4.6 resolves 69.1% versus 52.4% (seed-bootstrap (Aug 16, 2026)). Llama 4 Scout streams faster (155 tok/s) while Llama 4 Scout is the cheaper output token ($0.3/1M). Llama 4 Scout has the larger context window (1.3M tokens). Every cell below is a dated snapshot from a named public source — we do not invent missing scores, and we do not run SWE-bench ourselves.

Share Analysis:

WhatsApp Telegram X / Post LinkedIn Reddit

xAI

Grok 4.6

xAI Aug 12 2026 post-training refresh of Grok 4.5. Same $2/$6 API price, 500k context, stronger agentic traces.

Elo 1,592$6/1M out

Swap or Add Any Model to this Matchup

Instant pairwise benchmark recalculation across 400+ LLMs

Model A

Model B

Quick vs:vs Claude Opus 4.5 vs Claude Opus 4.6 vs Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Interactive Comparison Diagram

Matchup Breakdown

Tug-of-War Matchup Matrix

Category wins across intelligence, speed, and pricing efficiency.

Grok 4.6 (5)vsLlama 4 Scout (5)

Grok 4.6: 5W (50%)Overall: Even matchupLlama 4 Scout: 5W (50%)

← Grok 4.6Llama 4 Scout →

Grok 4.6 (5/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Preference Elo

1,592vs1,412

Coding Elo

1,568vs1,398

SWE-bench

69.1%vs52.4%

LiveBench

71.4%vs59.6%

GPQA Diamond

84.6%vs71.2%

Grok 4.6: 5WLlama 4 Scout: 0W

Llama 4 Scout (2/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Output speed

118 tok/svs155 tok/s

Time to first token

195 msvs130 ms

Grok 4.6: 0WLlama 4 Scout: 2W

Llama 4 Scout (3/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Output price

$6/1Mvs$0.3/1M

Input price

$2/1Mvs$0.1/1M

Context window

500kvs1.3M

Grok 4.6: 0WLlama 4 Scout: 3W

Capability Matchup Radar

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Each spoke is a skill. Farther from the center is better (0–100th percentile). Tap any dot to inspect details.

Tap any node to inspect

Percentile 0–100

Dimensional AdvantageEven 3–3

Preference Elo

Grok 4.6

180 pts advantage

Throughput Speed

Llama 4 Scout

37 tok/s faster

Price Efficiency

Llama 4 Scout

$5.70/1M cheaper

Full Benchmark Score Matrix

—

Elo

High is better

+13%1,592

EloHigh is better

1,412

Code Elo

High is better

+12%1,568

Code EloHigh is better

1,398

LiveBench

High is better

+20%71.4%

LiveBenchHigh is better

59.6%

SWE-bench

High is better

+32%69.1%

SWE-benchHigh is better

52.4%

GPQA

High is better

+19%84.6%

GPQAHigh is better

71.2%

TTFT

Low is better

195 ms

TTFTLow is better

130 ms+50%

Speed

High is better

118 tok/s

SpeedHigh is better

155 tok/s+31%

In $

Low is better

$2/1M

In $Low is better

$0.1/1M+1900%

Out $

Low is better

$6/1M

Out $Low is better

$0.3/1M+1900%

Context

High is better

500k

ContextHigh is better

1.3M+162%

Interactive Simulator

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs based on published $/1M tokens.

Save up to 95% with Llama 4 Scout

Monthly Volume50M tokens/mo

Quick Presets:

Token Ratio (In vs Out)70% In / 30% Out

RAG / Search (10% out)Coding / Chat (50% out)

Grok 4.6$160.00 / mo

In: $70.00Out: $90.00

Llama 4 Scout$8.00 / mo

In: $3.50Out: $4.50

Estimated Cost Delta

Llama 4 Scout is estimated to save $152.00/month ($1,824/year).

Based on 50M tokens (30% gen)

Key Selection Recommendations

1
Grok 4.6:Pick Grok 4.6 when repo-level coding accuracy is the constraint.
2
Llama 4 Scout:Pick Llama 4 Scout when you are optimizing output cost.
3
Llama 4 Scout:Pick Llama 4 Scout when time-to-first-token matters more than peak Elo.

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsGrok 4.6

Higher SWE-bench (69.1%).

High-volume chatLlama 4 Scout

Lower output list price ($0.3/1M).

Voice / low-latency UILlama 4 Scout

Lower TTFT (130 ms).

Long-document RAGLlama 4 Scout

Larger window (1.3M).

Screenshots / visionGrok 4.6

Both accept images. Defaulting to the higher-Elo side (Grok 4.6).

Target Workload	Recommended Pick	Evaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agents	Grok 4.6	Higher SWE-bench (69.1%).
High-volume chat	Llama 4 Scout	Lower output list price ($0.3/1M).
Voice / low-latency UI	Llama 4 Scout	Lower TTFT (130 ms).
Long-document RAG	Llama 4 Scout	Larger window (1.3M).
Screenshots / vision	Grok 4.6	Both accept images. Defaulting to the higher-Elo side (Grok 4.6).

Related Editorial Dispatches & Benchmark Notes

View all news

compareAug 16, 2026

Haiku 4.5 vs Llama 4 Scout: cheap Claude versus cheap open Llama

$1/$5 hosted Claude vs a cheap long-context open sibling. The alternative-to-Sonnet pair that is honest.

compareAug 12, 2026

Grok vs ChatGPT: price and Elo, not a personality contest

Brand hub remaps to top xAI vs top OpenAI. After Aug 12 that is Grok 4.6 vs Sol.

launchAug 12, 2026

Grok 4.6 (Aug 12): post-training refresh, same $2/$6 list

xAI’s Aug 12 2026 refresh of Grok 4.5. 500k context. The Grok vs ChatGPT hub remaps here.

launchApr 8, 2026

Llama 4 Scout: long-context open sibling of Maverick

Huge window, cheap hosted lists. The Haiku alternative that is actually open-weight.

Community Sentiment

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Share card

The real PNG is generated at /compare/grok-4-6-vs-llama-4-scout/opengraph-image for crawlers.

PNG

CompareLLM Matrix

Verified head-to-head card

LIVE

xAI

Grok 4.6

Elo 1,592

LiveBench71.4%

SWE-bench69.1%

Speed118 tok/s

Output cost$6/1M

Llama 4 Scout

Elo 1,412

LiveBench59.6%

SWE-bench52.4%

Speed155 tok/s

Output cost$0.3/1M

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, Grok 4.6 or Llama 4 Scout?: Grok 4.6 has the higher preference Elo in our latest snapshot (1,592). “Better” still depends on coding, price, and latency — see the table.
Which is better at coding, Grok 4.6 or Llama 4 Scout?: Grok 4.6 leads SWE-bench at 69.1% vs 52.4%. SWE-bench is one harness, not your repo.
Which is cheaper to run in production?: Llama 4 Scout output tokens are $0.3/1M versus $6/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.
Which is faster, Grok 4.6 or Llama 4 Scout?: Llama 4 Scout has the lower time-to-first-token (130 ms vs 195 ms). Tokens/sec is a separate column if you care about long completions.
Which has the larger context window?: Llama 4 Scout accepts 1.3M tokens versus 500k.
Can I self-host either model?: Llama 4 Scout is marked open-weights in our catalog. The other side is a closed API. Check the provider license before you ship weights.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?: No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?: Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. Grok 4.6 and Llama 4 Scout Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All Grok 4.6 matchups →|All Llama 4 Scout matchups →

Grok 4.6 vs Grok 4 (previous grok)Llama 4 Scout vs Llama 4 Maverick (previous llama)Claude Opus 4.8 vs Grok 4.6 GPT-5.6 Sol vs Grok 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 vs Grok 4.6 Gemini 3.6 Pro vs Grok 4.6

Grok 4.6 vs Llama 4 Scout benchmark

Interactive Comparison Diagram

Matchup Breakdown

Tug-of-War Matchup Matrix

Category wins across intelligence, speed, and pricing efficiency.

Grok 4.6 (5)vsLlama 4 Scout (5)

Grok 4.6: 5W (50%)Overall: Even matchupLlama 4 Scout: 5W (50%)

← Grok 4.6Llama 4 Scout →

Grok 4.6 (5/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Preference Elo

1,592vs1,412

Coding Elo

1,568vs1,398

SWE-bench

69.1%vs52.4%

LiveBench

71.4%vs59.6%

GPQA Diamond

84.6%vs71.2%

Grok 4.6: 5WLlama 4 Scout: 0W

Llama 4 Scout (2/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Output speed

118 tok/svs155 tok/s

Time to first token

195 msvs130 ms

Grok 4.6: 0WLlama 4 Scout: 2W

Llama 4 Scout (3/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Output price

$6/1Mvs$0.3/1M

Input price

$2/1Mvs$0.1/1M

Context window

500kvs1.3M

Grok 4.6: 0WLlama 4 Scout: 3W

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsGrok 4.6

Higher SWE-bench (69.1%).

High-volume chatLlama 4 Scout

Lower output list price ($0.3/1M).

Voice / low-latency UILlama 4 Scout

Lower TTFT (130 ms).

Long-document RAGLlama 4 Scout

Larger window (1.3M).

Screenshots / visionGrok 4.6

Both accept images. Defaulting to the higher-Elo side (Grok 4.6).

Target Workload	Recommended Pick	Evaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agents	Grok 4.6	Higher SWE-bench (69.1%).
High-volume chat	Llama 4 Scout	Lower output list price ($0.3/1M).
Voice / low-latency UI	Llama 4 Scout	Lower TTFT (130 ms).
Long-document RAG	Llama 4 Scout	Larger window (1.3M).
Screenshots / vision	Grok 4.6	Both accept images. Defaulting to the higher-Elo side (Grok 4.6).

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, Grok 4.6 or Llama 4 Scout?

Grok 4.6 has the higher preference Elo in our latest snapshot (1,592). “Better” still depends on coding, price, and latency — see the table.

Which is better at coding, Grok 4.6 or Llama 4 Scout?

Grok 4.6 leads SWE-bench at 69.1% vs 52.4%. SWE-bench is one harness, not your repo.

Which is cheaper to run in production?

Llama 4 Scout output tokens are $0.3/1M versus $6/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.

Which is faster, Grok 4.6 or Llama 4 Scout?

Llama 4 Scout has the lower time-to-first-token (130 ms vs 195 ms). Tokens/sec is a separate column if you care about long completions.

Which has the larger context window?

Llama 4 Scout accepts 1.3M tokens versus 500k.

Can I self-host either model?

Llama 4 Scout is marked open-weights in our catalog. The other side is a closed API. Check the provider license before you ship weights.

Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?

No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.

What does preference Elo mean on this page?

Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. Grok 4.6 and Llama 4 Scout Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Swap or Add Any Model to this Matchup

Interactive Comparison Diagram

Tug-of-War Matchup Matrix

Intelligence & Reasoning

Speed & Latency

Pricing & Capacity

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Grok 4.6

Llama 4 Scout

Llama 4 Scout

Full Benchmark Score Matrix

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Key Selection Recommendations

Recommended Workload Routing

Related Editorial Dispatches & Benchmark Notes

Haiku 4.5 vs Llama 4 Scout: cheap Claude versus cheap open Llama

Grok vs ChatGPT: price and Elo, not a personality contest

Grok 4.6 (Aug 12): post-training refresh, same $2/$6 list

Llama 4 Scout: long-context open sibling of Maverick

Cast Your Matchup Vote

Community Discussions (0)

Share card

CompareLLM Matrix

Grok 4.6

Llama 4 Scout

Frequently Asked Questions

Related news

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

Swap or Add Any Model to this Matchup

Interactive Comparison Diagram

Tug-of-War Matchup Matrix

Intelligence & Reasoning

Speed & Latency

Pricing & Capacity

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Grok 4.6

Llama 4 Scout

Llama 4 Scout

Full Benchmark Score Matrix

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Key Selection Recommendations

Recommended Workload Routing

Related Editorial Dispatches & Benchmark Notes

Haiku 4.5 vs Llama 4 Scout: cheap Claude versus cheap open Llama

Grok vs ChatGPT: price and Elo, not a personality contest

Grok 4.6 (Aug 12): post-training refresh, same $2/$6 list

Llama 4 Scout: long-context open sibling of Maverick

Cast Your Matchup Vote

Community Discussions (0)

Share card

CompareLLM Matrix

Grok 4.6

Llama 4 Scout

Frequently Asked Questions

Related news

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons