CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Live
LeaderboardModelsCompareStacksBest ofGuidesNewsMethod
…
CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Precision Benchmarks

Programmatic, dated AI model benchmarks, head-to-head comparisons, and Stack Engine presets.

Daily ingest · 06:00 UTC

Analytics & Benchmarks

  • AI Model Leaderboard
  • Head-to-Head Compare Hub
  • Models Directory
  • Stack Engine Presets
  • Frontier Models
  • Open Weights Catalog

Guides & Intent Lists

  • Best LLM Lists (2026)
  • Best Coding LLM
  • Best Cheap LLM
  • Fastest Low-Latency LLM
  • Claude vs GPT Benchmark
  • What is Elo?
  • Methodology Guides
  • News & Dispatches

Transparency & API

  • Evaluation Methodology
  • Benchmark Changelog
  • Public JSON API
  • llms.txt Specification
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sign In / Account

© 2026 CompareLLM. Public benchmark data aggregated from Arena Elo, LiveBench, SWE-bench & OpenRouter.

Every score has a dated snapshot.

  1. Home
  2. Comparisons
  3. MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 vs MiniMax M2.5

Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 16, 2026

MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 vs MiniMax M2.5 benchmark

This page compares MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 (Moonshot) and MiniMax M2.5 (MiniMax) using the latest snapshots we have as of Aug 16, 2026. On preference Elo, MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 is ahead by 37 points (1,515 vs 1,478; seed-bootstrap (Aug 1, 2026)). On SWE-bench coding, MiniMax M2.5 resolves 75.8% versus 71.3% (seed-bootstrap (Aug 1, 2026)). MiniMax M2.5 streams faster (90 tok/s) while MiniMax M2.5 is the cheaper output token ($0.9/1M). MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 has the larger context window (262k tokens). Every cell below is a dated snapshot from a named public source — we do not invent missing scores, and we do not run SWE-bench ourselves.

Quick answer

MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 vs MiniMax M2.5 is a dated snapshot, not a lab score. MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 leads preference Elo (1,515 vs 1,478). MiniMax M2.5 leads SWE-bench coding. MiniMax M2.5 is the cheaper output token. Elo is crowd preference, not an exam. Pick the column that matches the job.
Share Analysis:
WhatsAppTelegramX / PostLinkedInReddit

Moonshot

MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5

Auto-discovered from OpenRouter (moonshotai/kimi-k2.5). Preview until a second source matches.

Elo 1,515$2.8499999999999996/1M out

MiniMax

MiniMax M2.5

MiniMax coding model. Tied near the top of official SWE-bench bash-only in Feb 2026.

Elo 1,478$0.8999999999999999/1M out

Swap or Add Any Model to this Matchup

Instant pairwise benchmark recalculation across 400+ LLMs

Model A
Model B
Quick vs:vs Claude Opus 4.5vs Claude Opus 4.6vs Claude Sonnet 4.5vs Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Interactive Comparison Diagram

Matchup Breakdown

Tug-of-War Matchup Matrix

Category wins across intelligence, speed, and pricing efficiency.

MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 (4)vsMiniMax M2.5 (6)
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5: 4W (40%)Overall: MiniMax M2.5MiniMax M2.5: 6W (60%)
← MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5MiniMax M2.5 →
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 (3/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Preference Elo
1,515vs1,478
Coding Elo
1,520vs1,536
SWE-bench
71.3%vs75.8%
LiveBench
67.2%vs64.4%
GPQA Diamond
87.6%vs76.2%
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5: 3WMiniMax M2.5: 2W
MiniMax M2.5 (2/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Output speed
72 tok/svs90 tok/s
Time to first token
270 msvs250 ms
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5: 0WMiniMax M2.5: 2W
MiniMax M2.5 (2/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Output price
$2.85/1Mvs$0.9/1M
Input price
$0.57/1Mvs$0.22/1M
Context window
262kvs205k
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5: 1WMiniMax M2.5: 2W
Capability Matchup Radar

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Each spoke is a skill. Farther from the center is better (0–100th percentile). Tap any dot to inspect details.

Tap any node to inspect
Percentile 0–100
Dimensional AdvantageEven 3–3
Preference Elo

MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5

37 pts advantage

Throughput Speed

MiniMax M2.5

18 tok/s faster

Price Efficiency

MiniMax M2.5

$1.95/1M cheaper

Full Benchmark Score Matrix

—
Elo
High is better
+3%1,515
EloHigh is better
1,478
Code Elo
High is better
1,520
Code EloHigh is better
1,536+1%
LiveBench
High is better
+4%67.2%
LiveBenchHigh is better
64.4%
SWE-bench
High is better
71.3%
SWE-benchHigh is better
75.8%+6%
GPQA
High is better
+15%87.6%
GPQAHigh is better
76.2%
TTFT
Low is better
270 ms
TTFTLow is better
250 ms+8%
Speed
High is better
72 tok/s
SpeedHigh is better
90 tok/s+25%
In $
Low is better
$0.57/1M
In $Low is better
$0.22/1M+159%
Out $
Low is better
$2.85/1M
Out $Low is better
$0.9/1M+217%
Context
High is better
+28%262k
ContextHigh is better
205k
Interactive Simulator

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs based on published $/1M tokens.

Save up to 66% with MiniMax M2.5
Monthly Volume50M tokens/mo
Quick Presets:
Token Ratio (In vs Out)70% In / 30% Out
RAG / Search (10% out)Coding / Chat (50% out)
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5$62.70 / mo
In: $19.95Out: $42.75
MiniMax M2.5$21.20 / mo
In: $7.70Out: $13.50
Estimated Cost Delta

MiniMax M2.5 is estimated to save $41.50/month ($498/year).

Based on 50M tokens (30% gen)

Key Selection Recommendations

  • 1
    MiniMax M2.5:Pick MiniMax M2.5 when repo-level coding accuracy is the constraint.
  • 2
    MiniMax M2.5:Pick MiniMax M2.5 when time-to-first-token matters more than peak Elo.
  • 3
    MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5:Pick MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 as the default general assistant.

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsMiniMax M2.5

Higher SWE-bench (75.8%).

High-volume chatMiniMax M2.5

Lower output list price ($0.9/1M).

Voice / low-latency UIMiniMax M2.5

Lower TTFT (250 ms).

Long-document RAGMoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5

Larger window (262k).

Screenshots / visionMoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5

MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Target WorkloadRecommended PickEvaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agentsMiniMax M2.5Higher SWE-bench (75.8%).
High-volume chatMiniMax M2.5Lower output list price ($0.9/1M).
Voice / low-latency UIMiniMax M2.5Lower TTFT (250 ms).
Long-document RAGMoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5Larger window (262k).
Screenshots / visionMoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Related Editorial Dispatches & Benchmark Notes

View all news
launchFeb 12, 2026

MiniMax M2.5: the Feb 2026 SWE-bench specialist still on the board

Tied near the top of official SWE-bench bash-only in Feb 2026. Coding lists should still see it.

Community Sentiment

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

Sign in to cast your verified vote, bookmark models, and participate in benchmark discussions.Sign In to Post

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Share card

The real PNG is generated at /compare/kimi-k2-5-vs-minimax-m2-5/opengraph-image for crawlers.

PNG

CompareLLM Matrix

Verified head-to-head card

LIVE
VS
Moonshot

MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5

Elo 1,515
LiveBench67.2%
SWE-bench71.3%
Speed72 tok/s
Output cost$2.85/1M
MiniMax

MiniMax M2.5

Elo 1,478
LiveBench64.4%
SWE-bench75.8%
Speed90 tok/s
Output cost$0.9/1M

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 or MiniMax M2.5?
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 has the higher preference Elo in our latest snapshot (1,515). “Better” still depends on coding, price, and latency — see the table.
Which is better at coding, MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 or MiniMax M2.5?
MiniMax M2.5 leads SWE-bench at 75.8% vs 71.3%. SWE-bench is one harness, not your repo.
Which is cheaper to run in production?
MiniMax M2.5 output tokens are $0.9/1M versus $2.85/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.
Which is faster, MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 or MiniMax M2.5?
MiniMax M2.5 has the lower time-to-first-token (250 ms vs 270 ms). Tokens/sec is a separate column if you care about long completions.
Which has the larger context window?
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 accepts 262k tokens versus 205k.
Can I self-host either model?
MiniMax M2.5 is marked open-weights in our catalog. The other side is a closed API. Check the provider license before you ship weights.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?
No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?
Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 and MiniMax M2.5 Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Related news

  • launch · Feb 12, 2026

    MiniMax M2.5: the Feb 2026 SWE-bench specialist still on the board

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 matchups →|All MiniMax M2.5 matchups →
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711 (previous kimi)MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 vs Kimi K3 (next kimi)MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711 vs MiniMax M2.5Qwen 3 Max vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5Gemini 3.6 Flash vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5