CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Live
LeaderboardModelsCompareStacksBest ofGuidesNewsMethod
…
CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Precision Benchmarks

Programmatic, dated AI model benchmarks, head-to-head comparisons, and Stack Engine presets.

Daily ingest · 06:00 UTC

Analytics & Benchmarks

  • AI Model Leaderboard
  • Head-to-Head Compare Hub
  • Models Directory
  • Stack Engine Presets
  • Frontier Models
  • Open Weights Catalog

Guides & Intent Lists

  • Best LLM Lists (2026)
  • Best Coding LLM
  • Best Cheap LLM
  • Fastest Low-Latency LLM
  • Claude vs GPT Benchmark
  • What is Elo?
  • Methodology Guides
  • News & Dispatches

Transparency & API

  • Evaluation Methodology
  • Benchmark Changelog
  • Public JSON API
  • llms.txt Specification
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sign In / Account

© 2026 CompareLLM. Public benchmark data aggregated from Arena Elo, LiveBench, SWE-bench & OpenRouter.

Every score has a dated snapshot.

  1. Home
  2. Comparisons
  3. Llama 4 Maverick vs OpenAI: o3 Mini

Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 16, 2026

Llama 4 Maverick vs OpenAI: o3 Mini benchmark

This page compares Llama 4 Maverick (Meta) and OpenAI: o3 Mini (OpenAI) using the latest snapshots we have as of Aug 16, 2026. On preference Elo, OpenAI: o3 Mini is ahead by 92 points (1,560 vs 1,468; seed-bootstrap (Aug 1, 2026)). On SWE-bench coding, OpenAI: o3 Mini resolves 78.5% versus 57.1% (seed-bootstrap (Aug 1, 2026)). Llama 4 Maverick streams faster (130 tok/s) while Llama 4 Maverick is the cheaper output token ($0.8/1M). Llama 4 Maverick has the larger context window (1M tokens). Every cell below is a dated snapshot from a named public source — we do not invent missing scores, and we do not run SWE-bench ourselves.

Quick answer

Llama 4 Maverick vs OpenAI: o3 Mini is a dated snapshot, not a lab score. OpenAI: o3 Mini leads preference Elo (1,560 vs 1,468). OpenAI: o3 Mini leads SWE-bench coding. Llama 4 Maverick is the cheaper output token. Elo is crowd preference, not an exam. Pick the column that matches the job.
Share Analysis:
WhatsAppTelegramX / PostLinkedInReddit

Meta

Llama 4 Maverick

Meta natively multimodal open-weight flagship.

Elo 1,468$0.7999999999999999/1M out

OpenAI

OpenAI: o3 Mini

Auto-discovered from OpenRouter (openai/o3-mini). Preview until a second source matches.

Elo 1,560$4.4/1M out

Swap or Add Any Model to this Matchup

Instant pairwise benchmark recalculation across 400+ LLMs

Model A
Model B
Quick vs:vs Claude Opus 4.5vs Claude Opus 4.6vs Claude Sonnet 4.5vs Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Interactive Comparison Diagram

Matchup Breakdown

Tug-of-War Matchup Matrix

Category wins across intelligence, speed, and pricing efficiency.

Llama 4 Maverick (5)vsOpenAI: o3 Mini (5)
Llama 4 Maverick: 5W (50%)Overall: Even matchupOpenAI: o3 Mini: 5W (50%)
← Llama 4 MaverickOpenAI: o3 Mini →
OpenAI: o3 Mini (5/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Preference Elo
1,468vs1,560
Coding Elo
1,452vs1,585
SWE-bench
57.1%vs78.5%
LiveBench
62.8%vs72.4%
GPQA Diamond
74.6%vs87.2%
Llama 4 Maverick: 0WOpenAI: o3 Mini: 5W
Llama 4 Maverick (2/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Output speed
130 tok/svs92 tok/s
Time to first token
170 msvs290 ms
Llama 4 Maverick: 2WOpenAI: o3 Mini: 0W
Llama 4 Maverick (3/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Output price
$0.8/1Mvs$4.4/1M
Input price
$0.2/1Mvs$1.1/1M
Context window
1Mvs200k
Llama 4 Maverick: 3WOpenAI: o3 Mini: 0W
Capability Matchup Radar

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Each spoke is a skill. Farther from the center is better (0–100th percentile). Tap any dot to inspect details.

Tap any node to inspect
Percentile 0–100
Dimensional AdvantageEven 3–3
Preference Elo

OpenAI: o3 Mini

92 pts advantage

Throughput Speed

Llama 4 Maverick

38 tok/s faster

Price Efficiency

Llama 4 Maverick

$3.60/1M cheaper

Full Benchmark Score Matrix

—
Elo
High is better
1,468
EloHigh is better
1,560+6%
Code Elo
High is better
1,452
Code EloHigh is better
1,585+9%
LiveBench
High is better
62.8%
LiveBenchHigh is better
72.4%+15%
SWE-bench
High is better
57.1%
SWE-benchHigh is better
78.5%+37%
GPQA
High is better
74.6%
GPQAHigh is better
87.2%+17%
TTFT
Low is better
+71%170 ms
TTFTLow is better
290 ms
Speed
High is better
+41%130 tok/s
SpeedHigh is better
92 tok/s
In $
Low is better
+450%$0.2/1M
In $Low is better
$1.1/1M
Out $
Low is better
+450%$0.8/1M
Out $Low is better
$4.4/1M
Context
High is better
+424%1M
ContextHigh is better
200k
Interactive Simulator

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs based on published $/1M tokens.

Save up to 82% with Llama 4 Maverick
Monthly Volume50M tokens/mo
Quick Presets:
Token Ratio (In vs Out)70% In / 30% Out
RAG / Search (10% out)Coding / Chat (50% out)
Llama 4 Maverick$19.00 / mo
In: $7.00Out: $12.00
OpenAI: o3 Mini$104.50 / mo
In: $38.50Out: $66.00
Estimated Cost Delta

Llama 4 Maverick is estimated to save $85.50/month ($1,026/year).

Based on 50M tokens (30% gen)

Key Selection Recommendations

  • 1
    OpenAI: o3 Mini:Pick OpenAI: o3 Mini when repo-level coding accuracy is the constraint.
  • 2
    Llama 4 Maverick:Pick Llama 4 Maverick when you are optimizing output cost.
  • 3
    Llama 4 Maverick:Pick Llama 4 Maverick when time-to-first-token matters more than peak Elo.

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsOpenAI: o3 Mini

Higher SWE-bench (78.5%).

High-volume chatLlama 4 Maverick

Lower output list price ($0.8/1M).

Voice / low-latency UILlama 4 Maverick

Lower TTFT (170 ms).

Long-document RAGLlama 4 Maverick

Larger window (1M).

Screenshots / visionLlama 4 Maverick

Llama 4 Maverick is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Target WorkloadRecommended PickEvaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agentsOpenAI: o3 MiniHigher SWE-bench (78.5%).
High-volume chatLlama 4 MaverickLower output list price ($0.8/1M).
Voice / low-latency UILlama 4 MaverickLower TTFT (170 ms).
Long-document RAGLlama 4 MaverickLarger window (1M).
Screenshots / visionLlama 4 MaverickLlama 4 Maverick is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Related Editorial Dispatches & Benchmark Notes

View all news
compareApr 9, 2026

Llama vs Claude: open-weight Meta versus the Anthropic crown

Hub remaps to top Meta vs top Anthropic Elo. Usually Maverick vs Opus 5.

launchApr 8, 2026

Llama 4 Maverick: Meta’s natively multimodal open-weight flagship

Apr 2026. The Llama vs Claude hub uses the top Meta Elo row — usually Maverick.

launchDec 6, 2024

Llama 3.3 70B stays as the previous Meta 70B workhorse

Dec 2024 instruct 70B. Still a self-host baseline. Llama 4 is the 2026 buy.

Community Sentiment

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

Sign in to cast your verified vote, bookmark models, and participate in benchmark discussions.Sign In to Post

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Share card

The real PNG is generated at /compare/llama-4-maverick-vs-o3-mini/opengraph-image for crawlers.

PNG

CompareLLM Matrix

Verified head-to-head card

LIVE
VS
Meta

Llama 4 Maverick

Elo 1,468
LiveBench62.8%
SWE-bench57.1%
Speed130 tok/s
Output cost$0.8/1M
OpenAI

OpenAI: o3 Mini

Elo 1,560
LiveBench72.4%
SWE-bench78.5%
Speed92 tok/s
Output cost$4.4/1M

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, Llama 4 Maverick or OpenAI: o3 Mini?
OpenAI: o3 Mini has the higher preference Elo in our latest snapshot (1,560). “Better” still depends on coding, price, and latency — see the table.
Which is better at coding, Llama 4 Maverick or OpenAI: o3 Mini?
OpenAI: o3 Mini leads SWE-bench at 78.5% vs 57.1%. SWE-bench is one harness, not your repo.
Which is cheaper to run in production?
Llama 4 Maverick output tokens are $0.8/1M versus $4.4/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.
Which is faster, Llama 4 Maverick or OpenAI: o3 Mini?
Llama 4 Maverick has the lower time-to-first-token (170 ms vs 290 ms). Tokens/sec is a separate column if you care about long completions.
Which has the larger context window?
Llama 4 Maverick accepts 1M tokens versus 200k.
Can I self-host either model?
Llama 4 Maverick is marked open-weights in our catalog. The other side is a closed API. Check the provider license before you ship weights.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?
No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?
Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. Llama 4 Maverick and OpenAI: o3 Mini Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Related news

  • compare · Apr 9, 2026

    Llama vs Claude: open-weight Meta versus the Anthropic crown

  • launch · Apr 8, 2026

    Llama 4 Maverick: Meta’s natively multimodal open-weight flagship

  • launch · Dec 6, 2024

    Llama 3.3 70B stays as the previous Meta 70B workhorse

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All Llama 4 Maverick matchups →|All OpenAI: o3 Mini matchups →
Llama 4 Maverick vs Llama 3.3 70B (previous llama)Llama 4 Maverick vs Llama 4 Scout (next llama)OpenAI: o3 Mini vs OpenAI o1-mini (previous gpt-mini)OpenAI: o3 Mini vs GPT-5 mini (next gpt-mini)GPT-4.5 Orion vs OpenAI: o3 MiniGPT-5.6 Terra vs OpenAI: o3 Mini