CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Live
Leaderboard
Models
Compare
Best of & Stacks
Research & News
…
CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Precision Benchmarks

Programmatic, dated AI model benchmarks, head-to-head comparisons, and Stack Engine presets.

Daily ingest · 06:00 UTC

Analytics & Benchmarks

  • AI Model Leaderboard
  • Head-to-Head Compare Hub
  • Models Directory
  • Stack Engine Presets
  • Frontier Models
  • Open Weights Catalog

Guides & Intent Lists

  • Best LLM Lists (2026)
  • Best Coding LLM
  • Best Cheap LLM
  • Fastest Low-Latency LLM
  • Claude vs GPT Benchmark
  • What is Elo?
  • Methodology Guides
  • News & Dispatches

Transparency & API

  • Evaluation Methodology
  • Benchmark Changelog
  • Public JSON API
  • llms.txt Specification
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sign In / Account

© 2026 CompareLLM. Public benchmark data aggregated from Arena Elo, LiveBench, SWE-bench & OpenRouter.

Every score has a dated snapshot.

Theme:
Currency:
  1. Home
  2. Comparisons
  3. Llama 4 Maverick vs Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct

Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 17, 2026

Llama 4 Maverick vs Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct benchmark

In this head-to-head showdown, Llama 4 Maverick delivers higher overall intelligence and human-preferred responses (Elo 1,468 vs 1,425), while Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct leads in SWE-bench software engineering benchmarks (65.2%), while Llama 4 Maverick is more budget-friendly at $0.8/1M per 1M output tokens. Review the complete breakdown below to determine which model best fits your performance and budget requirements.

Executive Comparison Verdict

Bottom Line: Llama 4 Maverick holds the advantage over Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct in overall benchmark performance and human evaluation rankings. Choose Llama 4 Maverick for demanding workloads, or review the breakdown below to compare coding and pricing metrics.
Share Analysis:
WhatsAppTelegramXLinkedInReddit
Meta
Llama 4 Maverick

Meta natively multimodal open-weight flagship.

Elo 1,468$0.7999999999999999/1M out
Alibaba
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct

Auto-discovered from OpenRouter (qwen/qwen-2.5-coder-32b-instruct). Preview until a second source matches.

Elo 1,425$1/1M out
Top Rival Showdowns for Llama 4 Maverick
All Matchups
Compare vs:vs Claude Opus 4.5vs GPT-5vs Gemini 3 Provs Grok 4.6vs DeepSeek V4 Pro
Preference Leader

Llama 4 Maverick

Δ 43 Arena Elo pts

Throughput Leader

No shared data

No latency data

Value per Dollar Leader

Llama 4 Maverick

$0.7999999999999999 / 1M output

Capability Percentiles

Relative percentile scores computed across all active models in the benchmark catalog.

Capability Matchup Radar

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Each spoke is a skill. Farther from the center is better (0–100th percentile). Tap any dot to inspect details.

Tap any node to inspect
Percentile 0–100
Dimensional AdvantageEven 3–3
Head-to-Head Comparison

Overall Matchup Breakdown

Category wins across reasoning intelligence, generation speed, and token cost.

Llama 4 Maverick (7)vsQwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct (3)
Llama 4 Maverick: 7W (70%)Overall: Llama 4 MaverickQwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct: 3W (30%)
← Llama 4 MaverickQwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct →
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct (3/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Preference Elo
1,468vs1,425
Coding Elo
1,452vs1,495
SWE-bench
57.1%vs65.2%
LiveBench
62.8%vs64.8%
GPQA Diamond
74.6%vs—
Llama 4 Maverick: 2WQwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct: 3W
Llama 4 Maverick (2/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Output speed
130 tok/svs—
Time to first token
170 msvs—
Llama 4 Maverick: 2WQwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct: 0W
Llama 4 Maverick (3/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Output price
$0.8/1Mvs$1/1M
Input price
$0.2/1Mvs$0.66/1M
Context window
1Mvs33k
Llama 4 Maverick: 3WQwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct: 0W

Side-by-Side Benchmark Matrix

Preference EloLlama 4 Maverick (+43)
Llama 4 Maverick1,468
lmarena · Aug 17, 2026
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct1,425
lmarena · Aug 17, 2026
Coding EloQwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct (+43)
Llama 4 Maverick1,452
lmarena · Aug 17, 2026
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct1,495
lmarena · Aug 17, 2026
LiveBenchQwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct (+2%)
Llama 4 Maverick62.8%
livebench · Aug 17, 2026
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct64.8%
livebench · Aug 17, 2026
SWE-benchQwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct (+8.1%)
Llama 4 Maverick57.1%
swebench · Aug 17, 2026
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct65.2%
swebench · Aug 17, 2026
GPQA Diamond
Llama 4 Maverick74.6%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct—
Time to first token
Llama 4 Maverick170 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct—
Output speed
Llama 4 Maverick130 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct—
Input priceLlama 4 Maverick (+$0.46/1M)
Llama 4 Maverick$0.2/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct$0.66/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
Output priceLlama 4 Maverick (+$0.2/1M)
Llama 4 Maverick$0.8/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct$1/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
Context windowLlama 4 Maverick (+1M)
Llama 4 Maverick1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct33k
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
BenchmarkLlama 4 MaverickQwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructAdvantage Delta
Preference Elo
1,468
lmarena · Aug 17, 2026
1,425
lmarena · Aug 17, 2026
Llama 4 Maverick (+43)
Coding Elo
1,452
lmarena · Aug 17, 2026
1,495
lmarena · Aug 17, 2026
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct (+43)
LiveBench
62.8%
livebench · Aug 17, 2026
64.8%
livebench · Aug 17, 2026
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct (+2%)
SWE-bench
57.1%
swebench · Aug 17, 2026
65.2%
swebench · Aug 17, 2026
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct (+8.1%)
GPQA Diamond
74.6%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
——
Time to first token
170 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
——
Output speed
130 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
——
Input price
$0.2/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
$0.66/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
Llama 4 Maverick (+$0.46/1M)
Output price
$0.8/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
$1/1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
Llama 4 Maverick (+$0.2/1M)
Context window
1M
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
33k
openrouter · Aug 17, 2026
Llama 4 Maverick (+1M)
Interactive Simulator (USD)

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs in USD (US Dollar).

Save up to 50% with Llama 4 Maverick
Monthly Volume50M tokens/mo
Quick Presets:
Token Ratio (In vs Out)70% In / 30% Out
RAG / Search (10% out)Coding / Chat (50% out)
Llama 4 Maverick$19.00 / mo
In: $7Out: $12
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct$38.10 / mo
In: $23.1Out: $15
Estimated Cost Delta

Llama 4 Maverick is estimated to save $19.10/month ($229/year).

Based on 50M tokens (30% gen)

Key Selection Recommendations

  • 1
    Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct:Pick Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct when repo-level coding accuracy is the constraint.
  • 2
    Llama 4 Maverick:Pick Llama 4 Maverick when you are optimizing output cost.
  • 3
    Llama 4 Maverick:Pick Llama 4 Maverick for million-token RAG or long-document jobs.

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsQwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct

Higher SWE-bench (65.2%).

High-volume chatLlama 4 Maverick

Lower output list price ($0.8/1M).

Voice / low-latency UIinsufficient data

Need TTFT on both sides.

Long-document RAGLlama 4 Maverick

Larger window (1M).

Screenshots / visionLlama 4 Maverick

Llama 4 Maverick is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Target WorkloadRecommended PickEvaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agentsQwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructHigher SWE-bench (65.2%).
High-volume chatLlama 4 MaverickLower output list price ($0.8/1M).
Voice / low-latency UIinsufficient dataNeed TTFT on both sides.
Long-document RAGLlama 4 MaverickLarger window (1M).
Screenshots / visionLlama 4 MaverickLlama 4 Maverick is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Related Editorial Dispatches & Benchmark Notes

View all news
compareApr 9, 2026

Llama vs Claude: open-weight Meta versus the Anthropic crown

Hub remaps to top Meta vs top Anthropic Elo. Usually Maverick vs Opus 5.

launchApr 8, 2026

Llama 4 Maverick: Meta’s natively multimodal open-weight flagship

Apr 2026. The Llama vs Claude hub uses the top Meta Elo row — usually Maverick.

launchDec 6, 2024

Llama 3.3 70B stays as the previous Meta 70B workhorse

Dec 2024 instruct 70B. Still a self-host baseline. Llama 4 is the 2026 buy.

Community Sentiment

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

Sign in to cast your verified vote, bookmark models, and participate in benchmark discussions.Sign In to Post

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Share card

The real PNG is generated at /compare/llama-4-maverick-vs-qwen-2-5-coder-32b-instruct/opengraph-image for crawlers.

PNG

CompareLLM Matrix

Verified head-to-head card

LIVE
VS
Meta

Llama 4 Maverick

Elo 1,468
LiveBench62.8%
SWE-bench57.1%
Speed130 tok/s
Output cost$0.8/1M
Alibaba

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct

Elo 1,425
LiveBench64.8%
SWE-bench65.2%
Speed—
Output cost$1/1M

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, Llama 4 Maverick or Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct?
Llama 4 Maverick has the higher preference Elo in our latest snapshot (1,468). “Better” still depends on coding, price, and latency — see the table.
Which is better at coding, Llama 4 Maverick or Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct?
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct leads SWE-bench at 65.2% vs 57.1%. SWE-bench is one harness, not your repo.
Which is cheaper to run in production?
Llama 4 Maverick output tokens are $0.8/1M versus $1/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.
Which is faster, Llama 4 Maverick or Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct?
We do not have TTFT for both models.
Which has the larger context window?
Llama 4 Maverick accepts 1M tokens versus 33k.
Can I self-host either model?
Llama 4 Maverick is marked open-weights in our catalog. The other side is a closed API. Check the provider license before you ship weights.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?
No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?
Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. Llama 4 Maverick and Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Related news

  • compare · Apr 9, 2026

    Llama vs Claude: open-weight Meta versus the Anthropic crown

  • launch · Apr 8, 2026

    Llama 4 Maverick: Meta’s natively multimodal open-weight flagship

  • launch · Dec 6, 2024

    Llama 3.3 70B stays as the previous Meta 70B workhorse

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All Llama 4 Maverick matchups →|All Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct matchups →
Llama 4 Maverick vs Llama 3.3 70B (previous llama)Llama 4 Maverick vs Llama 4 Scout (next llama)Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct vs Qwen 2.5 Plus (next qwen)Qwen QwQ 32B vs Llama 4 MaverickQwen 3 Max vs Llama 4 MaverickQwen3 235B vs Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct