Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 17, 2026noindex (thin pair)

Llama 4 Maverick vs Recraft V4.1 Utility benchmark

Name: Llama 4 Maverick vs Recraft V4.1 Utility AI benchmark comparison
Creator: CompareLLM
License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

This page compares Llama 4 Maverick (Meta) and Recraft V4.1 Utility (Recraft) using the latest snapshots we have as of Aug 17, 2026. Every cell below is a dated snapshot from a named public source — we do not invent missing scores, and we do not run SWE-bench ourselves.

Share Analysis:

WhatsApp Telegram X / Post LinkedIn Reddit

Swap or Add Any Model to this Matchup

Instant pairwise benchmark recalculation across 400+ LLMs

Model A

Model B

Quick vs:vs Claude Opus 4.5 vs Claude Opus 4.6 vs Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Interactive Comparison Diagram

Matchup Breakdown

Tug-of-War Matchup Matrix

Category wins across intelligence, speed, and pricing efficiency.

Llama 4 Maverick (10)vsRecraft V4.1 Utility (0)

Llama 4 Maverick: 10W (100%)Overall: Llama 4 MaverickRecraft V4.1 Utility: 0W (0%)

← Llama 4 MaverickRecraft V4.1 Utility →

Llama 4 Maverick (5/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Preference Elo

1,468vs—

Coding Elo

1,452vs—

SWE-bench

57.1%vs—

LiveBench

62.8%vs—

GPQA Diamond

74.6%vs—

Llama 4 Maverick: 5WRecraft V4.1 Utility: 0W

Llama 4 Maverick (2/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Output speed

130 tok/svs—

Time to first token

170 msvs—

Llama 4 Maverick: 2WRecraft V4.1 Utility: 0W

Llama 4 Maverick (3/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Output price

$0.8/1Mvs—

Input price

$0.2/1Mvs—

Context window

1Mvs—

Llama 4 Maverick: 3WRecraft V4.1 Utility: 0W

Capability Matchup Radar

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Each spoke is a skill. Farther from the center is better (0–100th percentile). Tap any dot to inspect details.

Tap any node to inspect

Percentile 0–100

Dimensional AdvantageRecraft V4.1 Utility 5/6

Preference Elo

No shared data

Throughput Speed

No shared data

Price Efficiency

No shared data

Full Benchmark Score Matrix

—

Elo

High is better

1,468

EloHigh is better

—

Code Elo

High is better

1,452

Code EloHigh is better

—

LiveBench

High is better

62.8%

LiveBenchHigh is better

—

SWE-bench

High is better

57.1%

SWE-benchHigh is better

—

GPQA

High is better

74.6%

GPQAHigh is better

—

TTFT

Low is better

170 ms

TTFTLow is better

—

Speed

High is better

130 tok/s

SpeedHigh is better

—

In $

Low is better

$0.2/1M

In $Low is better

—

Out $

Low is better

$0.8/1M

Out $Low is better

—

Context

High is better

ContextHigh is better

—

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsinsufficient data

Need SWE-bench on both sides.

High-volume chatinsufficient data

Need list prices.

Voice / low-latency UIinsufficient data

Need TTFT on both sides.

Long-document RAGinsufficient data

Need context sizes.

Screenshots / visioninsufficient data

Both accept images. Defaulting to the higher-Elo side (undefined).

Target Workload	Recommended Pick	Evaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agents	insufficient data	Need SWE-bench on both sides.
High-volume chat	insufficient data	Need list prices.
Voice / low-latency UI	insufficient data	Need TTFT on both sides.
Long-document RAG	insufficient data	Need context sizes.
Screenshots / vision	insufficient data	Both accept images. Defaulting to the higher-Elo side (undefined).

Related Editorial Dispatches & Benchmark Notes

View all news

compareApr 9, 2026

Llama vs Claude: open-weight Meta versus the Anthropic crown

Hub remaps to top Meta vs top Anthropic Elo. Usually Maverick vs Opus 5.

launchApr 8, 2026

Llama 4 Maverick: Meta’s natively multimodal open-weight flagship

Apr 2026. The Llama vs Claude hub uses the top Meta Elo row — usually Maverick.

launchDec 6, 2024

Llama 3.3 70B stays as the previous Meta 70B workhorse

Dec 2024 instruct 70B. Still a self-host baseline. Llama 4 is the 2026 buy.

Community Sentiment

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Share card

The real PNG is generated at /compare/llama-4-maverick-vs-recraft-v4-1-utility/opengraph-image for crawlers.

PNG

CompareLLM Matrix

Verified head-to-head card

LIVE

Llama 4 Maverick

Elo 1,468

LiveBench62.8%

SWE-bench57.1%

Speed130 tok/s

Output cost$0.8/1M

Recraft

Recraft V4.1 Utility

Elo n/a

LiveBench—

SWE-bench—

Speed—

Output cost—

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, Llama 4 Maverick or Recraft V4.1 Utility?: We do not have preference Elo for both models, so we do not declare an overall winner. Compare the metrics that exist.
Which is better at coding, Llama 4 Maverick or Recraft V4.1 Utility?: SWE-bench is missing for at least one model, so we do not rank coding from a single number.
Which is cheaper to run in production?: List prices are missing for at least one model.
Which is faster, Llama 4 Maverick or Recraft V4.1 Utility?: We do not have TTFT for both models.
Which has the larger context window?: Context window is missing for at least one model.
Can I self-host either model?: Llama 4 Maverick is marked open-weights in our catalog. The other side is a closed API. Check the provider license before you ship weights.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?: No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?: Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. Llama 4 Maverick and Recraft V4.1 Utility Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All Llama 4 Maverick matchups →|All Recraft V4.1 Utility matchups →

Llama 4 Maverick vs Llama 3.3 70B (previous llama)Llama 4 Maverick vs Llama 4 Scout (next llama)Recraft V4.1 Utility vs Recraft V4.1 Utility Pro (next recraft)Doubao Pro 1.5 vs Llama 4 Maverick Yi-Lightning vs Llama 4 Maverick MiniMax M2.5 vs Llama 4 Maverick

Interactive Comparison Diagram

Matchup Breakdown

Tug-of-War Matchup Matrix

Category wins across intelligence, speed, and pricing efficiency.

Llama 4 Maverick (10)vsRecraft V4.1 Utility (0)

Llama 4 Maverick: 10W (100%)Overall: Llama 4 MaverickRecraft V4.1 Utility: 0W (0%)

← Llama 4 MaverickRecraft V4.1 Utility →

Llama 4 Maverick (5/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Preference Elo

1,468vs—

Coding Elo

1,452vs—

SWE-bench

57.1%vs—

LiveBench

62.8%vs—

GPQA Diamond

74.6%vs—

Llama 4 Maverick: 5WRecraft V4.1 Utility: 0W

Llama 4 Maverick (2/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Output speed

130 tok/svs—

Time to first token

170 msvs—

Llama 4 Maverick: 2WRecraft V4.1 Utility: 0W

Llama 4 Maverick (3/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Output price

$0.8/1Mvs—

Input price

$0.2/1Mvs—

Context window

1Mvs—

Llama 4 Maverick: 3WRecraft V4.1 Utility: 0W

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsinsufficient data

Need SWE-bench on both sides.

High-volume chatinsufficient data

Need list prices.

Voice / low-latency UIinsufficient data

Need TTFT on both sides.

Long-document RAGinsufficient data

Need context sizes.

Screenshots / visioninsufficient data

Both accept images. Defaulting to the higher-Elo side (undefined).

Target Workload	Recommended Pick	Evaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agents	insufficient data	Need SWE-bench on both sides.
High-volume chat	insufficient data	Need list prices.
Voice / low-latency UI	insufficient data	Need TTFT on both sides.
Long-document RAG	insufficient data	Need context sizes.
Screenshots / vision	insufficient data	Both accept images. Defaulting to the higher-Elo side (undefined).

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, Llama 4 Maverick or Recraft V4.1 Utility?

We do not have preference Elo for both models, so we do not declare an overall winner. Compare the metrics that exist.

Which is better at coding, Llama 4 Maverick or Recraft V4.1 Utility?

SWE-bench is missing for at least one model, so we do not rank coding from a single number.

Which is cheaper to run in production?

List prices are missing for at least one model.

Which is faster, Llama 4 Maverick or Recraft V4.1 Utility?

We do not have TTFT for both models.

Which has the larger context window?

Context window is missing for at least one model.

Can I self-host either model?

Llama 4 Maverick is marked open-weights in our catalog. The other side is a closed API. Check the provider license before you ship weights.

Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?

No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.

What does preference Elo mean on this page?

Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. Llama 4 Maverick and Recraft V4.1 Utility Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Swap or Add Any Model to this Matchup

Interactive Comparison Diagram

Tug-of-War Matchup Matrix

Intelligence & Reasoning

Speed & Latency

Pricing & Capacity

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

No shared data

No shared data

No shared data

Full Benchmark Score Matrix

Recommended Workload Routing

Related Editorial Dispatches & Benchmark Notes

Llama vs Claude: open-weight Meta versus the Anthropic crown

Llama 4 Maverick: Meta’s natively multimodal open-weight flagship

Llama 3.3 70B stays as the previous Meta 70B workhorse

Cast Your Matchup Vote

Community Discussions (0)

Share card

CompareLLM Matrix

Llama 4 Maverick

Recraft V4.1 Utility

Frequently Asked Questions

Related news

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

Swap or Add Any Model to this Matchup

Interactive Comparison Diagram

Tug-of-War Matchup Matrix

Intelligence & Reasoning

Speed & Latency

Pricing & Capacity

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

No shared data

No shared data

No shared data

Full Benchmark Score Matrix

Recommended Workload Routing

Related Editorial Dispatches & Benchmark Notes

Llama vs Claude: open-weight Meta versus the Anthropic crown

Llama 4 Maverick: Meta’s natively multimodal open-weight flagship

Llama 3.3 70B stays as the previous Meta 70B workhorse

Cast Your Matchup Vote

Community Discussions (0)

Share card

CompareLLM Matrix

Llama 4 Maverick

Recraft V4.1 Utility

Frequently Asked Questions

Related news

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons