CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Live
LeaderboardModelsCompareStacksBest ofGuidesNewsMethod
…
CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Precision Benchmarks

Programmatic, dated AI model benchmarks, head-to-head comparisons, and Stack Engine presets.

Daily ingest · 06:00 UTC

Analytics & Benchmarks

  • AI Model Leaderboard
  • Head-to-Head Compare Hub
  • Models Directory
  • Stack Engine Presets
  • Frontier Models
  • Open Weights Catalog

Guides & Intent Lists

  • Best LLM Lists (2026)
  • Best Coding LLM
  • Best Cheap LLM
  • Fastest Low-Latency LLM
  • Claude vs GPT Benchmark
  • What is Elo?
  • Methodology Guides
  • News & Dispatches

Transparency & API

  • Evaluation Methodology
  • Benchmark Changelog
  • Public JSON API
  • llms.txt Specification
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sign In / Account

© 2026 CompareLLM. Public benchmark data aggregated from Arena Elo, LiveBench, SWE-bench & OpenRouter.

Every score has a dated snapshot.

  1. Home
  2. Comparisons
  3. Llama 4 Scout vs Yi-Lightning

Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 16, 2026

Llama 4 Scout vs Yi-Lightning benchmark

This page compares Llama 4 Scout (Meta) and Yi-Lightning (01.AI) using the latest snapshots we have as of Aug 16, 2026. On preference Elo, Yi-Lightning is ahead by 63 points (1,475 vs 1,412; seed-bootstrap (Aug 1, 2026)). On SWE-bench coding, Yi-Lightning resolves 63.4% versus 52.4% (seed-bootstrap (Aug 1, 2026)). Llama 4 Scout streams faster (155 tok/s) while Yi-Lightning is the cheaper output token ($0.14/1M). Llama 4 Scout has the larger context window (1.3M tokens). Every cell below is a dated snapshot from a named public source — we do not invent missing scores, and we do not run SWE-bench ourselves.

Quick answer

Llama 4 Scout vs Yi-Lightning is a dated snapshot, not a lab score. Yi-Lightning leads preference Elo (1,475 vs 1,412). Yi-Lightning leads SWE-bench coding. Yi-Lightning is the cheaper output token. Elo is crowd preference, not an exam. Pick the column that matches the job.
Share Analysis:
WhatsAppTelegramX / PostLinkedInReddit

Meta

Llama 4 Scout

Meta open-weight Llama 4 long-context sibling of Maverick. Common public API lists sit near $0.08–$0.30 / $0.30–$0.70 per 1M; we store a conservative hosted list until OpenRouter overwrites.

Elo 1,412$0.3/1M out

01.AI

Yi-Lightning

01.AI ultra-fast reasoning model delivering top LiveBench efficiency.

Elo 1,475$0.14/1M out

Swap or Add Any Model to this Matchup

Instant pairwise benchmark recalculation across 400+ LLMs

Model A
Model B
Quick vs:vs Claude Opus 4.5vs Claude Opus 4.6vs Claude Sonnet 4.5vs Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Interactive Comparison Diagram

Matchup Breakdown

Tug-of-War Matchup Matrix

Category wins across intelligence, speed, and pricing efficiency.

Llama 4 Scout (4)vsYi-Lightning (6)
Llama 4 Scout: 4W (40%)Overall: Yi-LightningYi-Lightning: 6W (60%)
← Llama 4 ScoutYi-Lightning →
Yi-Lightning (5/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Preference Elo
1,412vs1,475
Coding Elo
1,398vs1,480
SWE-bench
52.4%vs63.4%
LiveBench
59.6%vs65%
GPQA Diamond
71.2%vs78%
Llama 4 Scout: 0WYi-Lightning: 5W
Llama 4 Scout (2/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Output speed
155 tok/svs130 tok/s
Time to first token
130 msvs150 ms
Llama 4 Scout: 2WYi-Lightning: 0W
Llama 4 Scout (2/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Output price
$0.3/1Mvs$0.14/1M
Input price
$0.1/1Mvs$0.14/1M
Context window
1.3Mvs16k
Llama 4 Scout: 2WYi-Lightning: 1W
Capability Matchup Radar

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Each spoke is a skill. Farther from the center is better (0–100th percentile). Tap any dot to inspect details.

Tap any node to inspect
Percentile 0–100
Dimensional AdvantageYi-Lightning 4/6
Preference Elo

Yi-Lightning

63 pts advantage

Throughput Speed

Llama 4 Scout

25 tok/s faster

Price Efficiency

Yi-Lightning

$0.16/1M cheaper

Full Benchmark Score Matrix

—
Elo
High is better
1,412
EloHigh is better
1,475+4%
Code Elo
High is better
1,398
Code EloHigh is better
1,480+6%
LiveBench
High is better
59.6%
LiveBenchHigh is better
65%+9%
SWE-bench
High is better
52.4%
SWE-benchHigh is better
63.4%+21%
GPQA
High is better
71.2%
GPQAHigh is better
78%+10%
TTFT
Low is better
+15%130 ms
TTFTLow is better
150 ms
Speed
High is better
+19%155 tok/s
SpeedHigh is better
130 tok/s
In $
Low is better
+40%$0.1/1M
In $Low is better
$0.14/1M
Out $
Low is better
$0.3/1M
Out $Low is better
$0.14/1M+114%
Context
High is better
+7900%1.3M
ContextHigh is better
16k
Interactive Simulator

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs based on published $/1M tokens.

Save up to 13% with Yi-Lightning
Monthly Volume50M tokens/mo
Quick Presets:
Token Ratio (In vs Out)70% In / 30% Out
RAG / Search (10% out)Coding / Chat (50% out)
Llama 4 Scout$8.00 / mo
In: $3.50Out: $4.50
Yi-Lightning$7.00 / mo
In: $4.90Out: $2.10
Estimated Cost Delta

Yi-Lightning is estimated to save $1.00/month ($12/year).

Based on 50M tokens (30% gen)

Key Selection Recommendations

  • 1
    Yi-Lightning:Pick Yi-Lightning when repo-level coding accuracy is the constraint.
  • 2
    Llama 4 Scout:Pick Llama 4 Scout when time-to-first-token matters more than peak Elo.
  • 3
    Llama 4 Scout:Pick Llama 4 Scout for million-token RAG or long-document jobs.

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsYi-Lightning

Higher SWE-bench (63.4%).

High-volume chatYi-Lightning

Lower output list price ($0.14/1M).

Voice / low-latency UILlama 4 Scout

Lower TTFT (130 ms).

Long-document RAGLlama 4 Scout

Larger window (1.3M).

Screenshots / visionLlama 4 Scout

Llama 4 Scout is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Target WorkloadRecommended PickEvaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agentsYi-LightningHigher SWE-bench (63.4%).
High-volume chatYi-LightningLower output list price ($0.14/1M).
Voice / low-latency UILlama 4 ScoutLower TTFT (130 ms).
Long-document RAGLlama 4 ScoutLarger window (1.3M).
Screenshots / visionLlama 4 ScoutLlama 4 Scout is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Related Editorial Dispatches & Benchmark Notes

View all news
compareAug 16, 2026

Haiku 4.5 vs Llama 4 Scout: cheap Claude versus cheap open Llama

$1/$5 hosted Claude vs a cheap long-context open sibling. The alternative-to-Sonnet pair that is honest.

launchApr 8, 2026

Llama 4 Scout: long-context open sibling of Maverick

Huge window, cheap hosted lists. The Haiku alternative that is actually open-weight.

Community Sentiment

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

Sign in to cast your verified vote, bookmark models, and participate in benchmark discussions.Sign In to Post

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Share card

The real PNG is generated at /compare/llama-4-scout-vs-yi-lightning/opengraph-image for crawlers.

PNG

CompareLLM Matrix

Verified head-to-head card

LIVE
VS
Meta

Llama 4 Scout

Elo 1,412
LiveBench59.6%
SWE-bench52.4%
Speed155 tok/s
Output cost$0.3/1M
01.AI

Yi-Lightning

Elo 1,475
LiveBench65%
SWE-bench63.4%
Speed130 tok/s
Output cost$0.14/1M

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, Llama 4 Scout or Yi-Lightning?
Yi-Lightning has the higher preference Elo in our latest snapshot (1,475). “Better” still depends on coding, price, and latency — see the table.
Which is better at coding, Llama 4 Scout or Yi-Lightning?
Yi-Lightning leads SWE-bench at 63.4% vs 52.4%. SWE-bench is one harness, not your repo.
Which is cheaper to run in production?
Yi-Lightning output tokens are $0.14/1M versus $0.3/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.
Which is faster, Llama 4 Scout or Yi-Lightning?
Llama 4 Scout has the lower time-to-first-token (130 ms vs 150 ms). Tokens/sec is a separate column if you care about long completions.
Which has the larger context window?
Llama 4 Scout accepts 1.3M tokens versus 16k.
Can I self-host either model?
Llama 4 Scout is marked open-weights in our catalog. The other side is a closed API. Check the provider license before you ship weights.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?
No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?
Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. Llama 4 Scout and Yi-Lightning Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Related news

  • compare · Aug 16, 2026

    Haiku 4.5 vs Llama 4 Scout: cheap Claude versus cheap open Llama

  • launch · Apr 8, 2026

    Llama 4 Scout: long-context open sibling of Maverick

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All Llama 4 Scout matchups →|All Yi-Lightning matchups →
Llama 4 Scout vs Llama 4 Maverick (previous llama)Yi-Lightning vs Yi-Large (previous other)Yi-Lightning vs Ernie 4.5 Turbo (next other)Llama 4 Maverick vs Yi-LightningYi-Large vs Llama 4 ScoutLlama 3.1 405B vs Llama 4 Scout