CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Live
Leaderboard
Models
Compare
Best of & Stacks
Research & News
…
CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Precision Benchmarks

Programmatic, dated AI model benchmarks, head-to-head comparisons, and Stack Engine presets.

Daily ingest · 06:00 UTC

Analytics & Benchmarks

  • AI Model Leaderboard
  • Head-to-Head Compare Hub
  • Models Directory
  • Stack Engine Presets
  • Frontier Models
  • Open Weights Catalog

Guides & Intent Lists

  • Best LLM Lists (2026)
  • Best Coding LLM
  • Best Cheap LLM
  • Fastest Low-Latency LLM
  • Claude vs GPT Benchmark
  • What is Elo?
  • Methodology Guides
  • News & Dispatches

Transparency & API

  • Evaluation Methodology
  • Benchmark Changelog
  • Public JSON API
  • llms.txt Specification
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sign In / Account

© 2026 CompareLLM. Public benchmark data aggregated from Arena Elo, LiveBench, SWE-bench & OpenRouter.

Every score has a dated snapshot.

Theme:
Currency:
  1. Home
  2. Comparisons
  3. Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) vs Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct

Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 17, 2026noindex (thin pair)

Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) vs Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct benchmark

Comparing verified benchmark accuracy, speed, and token pricing between Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) and Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct. Review the complete breakdown below to determine which model best fits your performance and budget requirements.

Executive Comparison Verdict

Bottom Line: Both Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) and Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct present distinct architectural strengths. Compare the verified benchmark matrix below to choose the model tailored to your specific application requirements.
Share Analysis:
WhatsAppTelegramXLinkedInReddit
Google
Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)

Google high-speed multimodal generative model delivering top Elo performance at half the latency and cost of Pro.

Flash ImageImg Elo 1,323$67/1k imgs
Alibaba
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct

Auto-discovered from OpenRouter (qwen/qwen-2.5-coder-32b-instruct). Preview until a second source matches.

Img Elo 1,425

Nano Banana (Gemini Image) Family & Variants (3)

Speed, cost, and intelligence tradeoffs across the Google lineup

vs Base Model
Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image)
Google
Base Model
Img Elo1299
Latency4.2s
$/1k$134/1k
Prompt %92.5%
View specs →vs this
Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)
Google
Flash Image
Img Elo1323
Latency2.5s
$/1k$67/1k
Prompt %93.8%
+24 Elo-50% price
Selected
Nano Banana 2 Lite
Google
Lite / Sub-1.5s
Img Elo1293
Latency1.4s
$/1k$33.6/1k
Prompt %89.5%
-6 Elo-75% price
View specs →vs this
Top Rival Showdowns for Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)
All Matchups
Compare vs:vs GPT Image 2 (High)vs Reve 2.1vs FLUX.2 [max]vs Ideogram 4.0 (Quality)vs Recraft V4.1 Utility Pro
Image Quality Leader

No shared data

Single model data

Generation Speed Leader

No shared data

No latency data

Value per Dollar Leader

No shared data

Unpriced

Head-to-Head Comparison

Overall Matchup Breakdown

Category wins across reasoning intelligence, generation speed, and token cost.

Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) (5)vsQwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct (0)
Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image): 5W (100%)Overall: Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct: 0W (0%)
← Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct →
Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) (3/3)

Visual Quality & Adherence

Arena Preference Elo, prompt fidelity & typography score

Image Elo
1,323vs—
Prompt adherence
93.8%vs—
Text rendering
94.2%vs—
Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image): 3WQwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct: 0W
Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) (1/1)

Generation Latency

Time to render full-resolution image snapshot (seconds)

Generation time
2.5svs—
Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image): 1WQwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct: 0W
Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) (1/1)

Cost Efficiency

API inference cost per 1,000 generated images

Price per 1k images
$67/1kvs—
Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image): 1WQwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct: 0W

Side-by-Side Benchmark Matrix

Image Elo
Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)1,323
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct—
Generation time
Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)2.5s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct—
Price per 1k images
Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)$67/1k
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct—
Prompt adherence
Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)93.8%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct—
Text rendering
Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)94.2%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct—
BenchmarkNano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)Qwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructAdvantage Delta
Image Elo
1,323
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
——
Generation time
2.5s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
——
Price per 1k images
$67/1k
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
——
Prompt adherence
93.8%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
——
Text rendering
94.2%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
——
Interactive Simulator (USD)

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs in USD (US Dollar).

Save up to 100% with Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
Monthly Image Production Volume25k images / month (25000 imgs)
Quick Presets:
Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)$1,675.00 / mo
Rate: $67/1k
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct$0.00 / mo
Rate: $0/1k
Estimated Cost Delta

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct is estimated to save $1,675.00/month ($20,100/year).

Based on 25k images generated

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsinsufficient data

Need SWE-bench on both sides.

High-volume chatinsufficient data

Need list prices.

Voice / low-latency UIinsufficient data

Need TTFT on both sides.

Long-document RAGinsufficient data

Need context sizes.

Screenshots / visionNano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)

Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Target WorkloadRecommended PickEvaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agentsinsufficient dataNeed SWE-bench on both sides.
High-volume chatinsufficient dataNeed list prices.
Voice / low-latency UIinsufficient dataNeed TTFT on both sides.
Long-document RAGinsufficient dataNeed context sizes.
Screenshots / visionNano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.
Community Sentiment

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

Sign in to cast your verified vote, bookmark models, and participate in benchmark discussions.Sign In to Post

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Share card

The real PNG is generated at /compare/nano-banana-2-vs-qwen-2-5-coder-32b-instruct/opengraph-image for crawlers.

PNG

CompareLLM Matrix

Verified head-to-head card

LIVE
VS
Google

Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)

Elo n/a
LiveBench—
SWE-bench—
Speed—
Output cost—
Alibaba

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct

Elo 1,425
LiveBench64.8%
SWE-bench65.2%
Speed—
Output cost$1/1M

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) or Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct?
We do not have preference Elo for both models, so we do not declare an overall winner. Compare the metrics that exist.
Which is better at coding, Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) or Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct?
SWE-bench is missing for at least one model, so we do not rank coding from a single number.
Which is cheaper to run in production?
List prices are missing for at least one model.
Which is faster, Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) or Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct?
We do not have TTFT for both models.
Which has the larger context window?
Context window is missing for at least one model.
Can I self-host either model?
Neither model is marked open-weights here. You are comparing hosted APIs.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?
No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?
Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) and Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) matchups →|All Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct matchups →
Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) vs Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image) (previous nano-banana)Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) vs Nano Banana 2 Lite (next nano-banana)Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct vs Qwen 2.5 Plus (next qwen)Gemini 3 Pro vs Qwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructGemini 3 Flash vs Qwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructQwen 3 Max vs Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct