Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 17, 2026noindex (thin pair)

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct vs ReMM SLERP 13B benchmark

Name: Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct vs ReMM SLERP 13B AI benchmark comparison
Creator: CompareLLM
License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

In this head-to-head showdown, ReMM SLERP 13B is more budget-friendly at $0.65/1M per 1M output tokens. Review the complete breakdown below to determine which model best fits your performance and budget requirements.

Share Analysis:Share:

WhatsApp Telegram X LinkedIn

Executive Verdict Summary

ReMM SLERP 13B holds empirical advantage (2 of 3 metrics)

Coding / SWESWE-bench

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructTop code solve rate

ReasoningGPQA / Live

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructTop logical accuracy

Best Value$/1M Tok

ReMM SLERP 13BLowest API billing cost

Speed / TokTok/Sec

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructFastest stream rate

Verified Advantage Breakdown

3 benchmarks evaluated across capability, speed, and cost

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct (1)ReMM SLERP 13B (2)

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct

1 of 3 Wins

✓Context window

ReMM SLERP 13B

2 of 3 Wins

✓Input price✓Output price

Alibaba

Leads 1 of 3

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct

Auto-discovered from OpenRouter (qwen/qwen-2.5-coder-32b-instruct). Preview until a second source matches.

Elo 1,425In: $0.66 · Out: $1/1M

undi95

Leads 2 of 3

ReMM SLERP 13B

Auto-discovered from OpenRouter (undi95/remm-slerp-l2-13b). Preview until a second source matches.

In: $0.45 · Out: $0.65/1M

Top Rival Showdowns for Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct

All Matchups

Compare vs:vs Claude Opus 4.5 vs GPT-5 vs Gemini 3 Pro vs Grok 4.6 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro

Preference Leader

No shared data

Single model data

Throughput Leader

No shared data

No latency data

Value per Dollar LeaderReMM SLERP 13B Wins

ReMM SLERP 13B

$0.65 / 1M output

Capability Percentiles

Relative percentile scores computed across all active models in the benchmark catalog.

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Leaders Matchup Capability Radar

Comparing top standard models across 6 key capability dimensions. Tap any spoke or dot to inspect.

Tap any node to inspect

0–100 %ile

Overall Matchup Breakdown

Category wins across reasoning intelligence, generation speed, and token cost.

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct (5)vsReMM SLERP 13B (2)

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct: 5W (71%)ReMM SLERP 13B: 2W (29%)

← Qwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructReMM SLERP 13B →

🏆Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct Leads(4/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Benchmark

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructvsReMM SLERP 13B

Preference Elo

1,425vs—

Coding Elo

1,495vs—

SWE-bench

65.2%vs—

LiveBench

64.8%vs—

GPQA Diamond

—vs—

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct: 4WReMM SLERP 13B: 0W

Tied (0-0)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Benchmark

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructvsReMM SLERP 13B

Output speed

—vs—

Time to first token

—vs—

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct: 0WReMM SLERP 13B: 0W

🏆ReMM SLERP 13B Leads(2/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Benchmark

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructvsReMM SLERP 13B

Output price

$1/1Mvs$0.65/1M+$0.35/1M

Input price

$0.66/1Mvs$0.45/1M+$0.21/1M

Context window

33kvs6k+27k

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct: 1WReMM SLERP 13B: 2W

Side-by-Side Benchmark Matrix

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructReMM SLERP 13B

Preference Elo

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct1,425

ReMM SLERP 13B—

Coding Elo

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct1,495

ReMM SLERP 13B—

LiveBench

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct64.8%

ReMM SLERP 13B—

SWE-bench

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct65.2%

ReMM SLERP 13B—

Input priceReMM SLERP 13B +$0.21/1M

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct$0.66/1M

ReMM SLERP 13B$0.45/1M

Output priceReMM SLERP 13B +$0.35/1M

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct$1/1M

ReMM SLERP 13B$0.65/1M

Context windowQwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct +27k

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct33k

ReMM SLERP 13B6k

Benchmark	Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct	ReMM SLERP 13B	Advantage Delta
Preference Elo	1,425 lmarena · Aug 17, 2026	—	—
Coding Elo	1,495 lmarena · Aug 17, 2026	—	—
LiveBench	64.8% livebench · Aug 17, 2026	—	—
SWE-bench	65.2% swebench · Aug 17, 2026	—	—
Input price	$0.66/1M openrouter · Aug 17, 2026	$0.45/1M openrouter · Aug 17, 2026	+$0.21/1M
Output price	$1/1M openrouter · Aug 17, 2026	$0.65/1M openrouter · Aug 17, 2026	+$0.35/1M
Context window	33k openrouter · Aug 17, 2026	6k openrouter · Aug 17, 2026	+27k

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs in USD (US Dollar).

Save 33% with ReMM SLERP 13B

Monthly Volume50M tokens/mo

Quick Presets:

Token Ratio (In vs Out)70% In / 30% Out

RAG / Search (10% out)Coding / Chat (50% out)

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct$38.10 / mo

In: $23.1Out: $15

ReMM SLERP 13B$25.50 / mo

In: $15.75Out: $9.75

Estimated Cost Delta

ReMM SLERP 13B is estimated to save $12.60/month ($151/year).

Based on 50M tokens (30% gen)

Key Selection Recommendations

1
ReMM SLERP 13B:Pick ReMM SLERP 13B when you are optimizing output cost.

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsinsufficient data

Need SWE-bench on both sides.

High-volume chatReMM SLERP 13B

Lower output list price ($0.65/1M).

Voice / low-latency UIinsufficient data

Need TTFT on both sides.

Long-document RAGQwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct

Larger window (33k).

Screenshots / visioninsufficient data

Neither side is marked as vision-capable.

Target Workload	Recommended Pick	Evaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agents	insufficient data	Need SWE-bench on both sides.
High-volume chat	ReMM SLERP 13B	Lower output list price ($0.65/1M).
Voice / low-latency UI	insufficient data	Need TTFT on both sides.
Long-document RAG	Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct	Larger window (33k).
Screenshots / vision	insufficient data	Neither side is marked as vision-capable.

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Social Share Card Preview

Dynamic OpenGraph banner generated at /compare/qwen-2-5-coder-32b-instruct-vs-remm-slerp-l2-13b/opengraph-image

Save PNG

CompareLLM AI Matrix

Verified Head-to-Head Telemetry

LIVE BENCHMARK

Alibaba

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct

Elo 1,425

SWE-bench65.2%

Speed (tok/s)33k

Input / 1M Tokens$0.66/1M

Output / 1M Tokens$1/1M

undi95

ReMM SLERP 13B

Elo n/a

SWE-bench—

Speed (tok/s)6k

Input / 1M Tokens$0.45/1M

Output / 1M Tokens$0.65/1M

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct or ReMM SLERP 13B?: We do not have preference Elo for both models, so we do not declare an overall winner. Compare the metrics that exist.
Which is better at coding, Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct or ReMM SLERP 13B?: SWE-bench is missing for at least one model, so we do not rank coding from a single number.
Which is cheaper to run in production?: ReMM SLERP 13B output tokens are $0.65/1M versus $1/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.
Which is faster, Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct or ReMM SLERP 13B?: We do not have TTFT for both models.
Which has the larger context window?: Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct accepts 33k tokens versus 6k.
Can I self-host either model?: Neither model is marked open-weights here. You are comparing hosted APIs.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?: No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?: Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct and ReMM SLERP 13B Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct matchups →|All ReMM SLERP 13B matchups →

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct vs Qwen 2.5 Plus (next qwen)Qwen 3 Max vs Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct Qwen QwQ 32B vs Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B vs Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct Qwen3 235B vs Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct Qwen3.8 27B vs Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct

Capability Percentiles

Relative percentile scores computed across all active models in the benchmark catalog.

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Leaders Matchup Capability Radar

Comparing top standard models across 6 key capability dimensions. Tap any spoke or dot to inspect.

Tap any node to inspect

0–100 %ile

Side-by-Side Benchmark Matrix

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructReMM SLERP 13B

Preference Elo

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct1,425

ReMM SLERP 13B—

Coding Elo

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct1,495

ReMM SLERP 13B—

LiveBench

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct64.8%

ReMM SLERP 13B—

SWE-bench

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct65.2%

ReMM SLERP 13B—

Input priceReMM SLERP 13B +$0.21/1M

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct$0.66/1M

ReMM SLERP 13B$0.45/1M

Output priceReMM SLERP 13B +$0.35/1M

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct$1/1M

ReMM SLERP 13B$0.65/1M

Context windowQwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct +27k

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct33k

ReMM SLERP 13B6k

Benchmark

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct

ReMM SLERP 13B

Advantage Delta

Preference Elo

1,425

lmarena · Aug 17, 2026

—

Coding Elo

1,495

lmarena · Aug 17, 2026

—

LiveBench

64.8%

livebench · Aug 17, 2026

—

SWE-bench

65.2%

swebench · Aug 17, 2026

—

Input price

$0.66/1M

openrouter · Aug 17, 2026

$0.45/1M

openrouter · Aug 17, 2026

+$0.21/1M

Output price

$1/1M

openrouter · Aug 17, 2026

$0.65/1M

openrouter · Aug 17, 2026

+$0.35/1M

Context window

33k

openrouter · Aug 17, 2026

+27k

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsinsufficient data

Need SWE-bench on both sides.

High-volume chatReMM SLERP 13B

Lower output list price ($0.65/1M).

Voice / low-latency UIinsufficient data

Need TTFT on both sides.

Long-document RAGQwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct

Larger window (33k).

Screenshots / visioninsufficient data

Neither side is marked as vision-capable.

Target Workload	Recommended Pick	Evaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agents	insufficient data	Need SWE-bench on both sides.
High-volume chat	ReMM SLERP 13B	Lower output list price ($0.65/1M).
Voice / low-latency UI	insufficient data	Need TTFT on both sides.
Long-document RAG	Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct	Larger window (33k).
Screenshots / vision	insufficient data	Neither side is marked as vision-capable.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct or ReMM SLERP 13B?

We do not have preference Elo for both models, so we do not declare an overall winner. Compare the metrics that exist.

Which is better at coding, Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct or ReMM SLERP 13B?

SWE-bench is missing for at least one model, so we do not rank coding from a single number.

Which is cheaper to run in production?

ReMM SLERP 13B output tokens are $0.65/1M versus $1/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.

Which is faster, Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct or ReMM SLERP 13B?

We do not have TTFT for both models.

Which has the larger context window?

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct accepts 33k tokens versus 6k.

Can I self-host either model?

Neither model is marked open-weights here. You are comparing hosted APIs.

Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?

No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.

What does preference Elo mean on this page?

Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct and ReMM SLERP 13B Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.