CompareLLM.ai
Live
Leaderboard
Models
Compare
Best of & Stacks
Research & News
…
CompareLLM.ai
Precision Benchmarks

Programmatic, dated AI model benchmarks, head-to-head comparisons, and Stack Engine presets.

Daily ingest · 06:00 UTC

Analytics & Benchmarks

  • AI Model Leaderboard
  • Head-to-Head Compare Hub
  • Models Directory
  • Stack Engine Presets
  • Frontier Models
  • Open Weights Catalog

Guides & Intent Lists

  • Best LLM Lists (2026)
  • Best Coding LLM
  • Best Cheap LLM
  • Fastest Low-Latency LLM
  • Claude vs GPT Benchmark
  • What is Elo?
  • Methodology Guides
  • News & Dispatches

Transparency & API

  • Evaluation Methodology
  • Benchmark Changelog
  • Public JSON API
  • llms.txt Specification
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sign In / Account

© 2026 CompareLLM. Public benchmark data aggregated from Arena Elo, LiveBench, SWE-bench & OpenRouter.

Every score has a dated snapshot.

Theme:
Currency:
  1. Home
  2. Comparisons
  3. Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Gemini 1.5 Pro

Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 16, 2026

Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Gemini 1.5 Pro benchmark

In this head-to-head showdown, Claude Haiku 4.5 delivers higher overall intelligence and human-preferred responses (Elo 1,438 vs 1,260), while Claude Haiku 4.5 leads in SWE-bench software engineering benchmarks (58.2%), while Claude Haiku 4.5 is more budget-friendly at $5/1M per 1M output tokens. Review the complete breakdown below to determine which model best fits your performance and budget requirements.

Executive Comparison Verdict

Bottom Line: Claude Haiku 4.5 holds the advantage over Gemini 1.5 Pro in overall benchmark performance and human evaluation rankings. Choose Claude Haiku 4.5 for demanding workloads, or review the breakdown below to compare coding and pricing metrics.
Share Analysis:
WhatsAppTelegramXLinkedInReddit

Verified Head-to-Head Advantage Breakdown

8 direct benchmark disciplines evaluated across capability, speed, and cost

Claude Haiku 4.5 (7)Gemini 1.5 Pro (1)
Claude Haiku 4.5
7 of 8 Wins
✓Preference Elo✓LiveBench✓SWE-bench✓GPQA Diamond✓Time to first token✓Output speed✓Input price
Gemini 1.5 Pro
1 of 8 Wins
✓Context window
Anthropic
Leads 7 of 8 metrics
Claude Haiku 4.5

Anthropic cheap/fast Claude SKU. Official Claude Platform list price $1/$5 per 1M tokens (Anthropic Haiku page).

Haiku 4.5Elo 1,438$5/1M out
Google
Leads 1 of 8 metrics
Gemini 1.5 Pro

First million-token Gemini Pro. Baseline for 1.5 vs 2.5 vs 3.x Pro.

Elo 1,260$5/1M out

Claude 4 Series Lineage & Sibling Variants

5 models

Currently comparing Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Gemini 1.5 Pro. Alternative family tiers available.

Active: Claude Haiku 4.5
Claude Opus 4.5$75Claude Opus 4.6$75Claude Sonnet 4.5$15Claude Opus 4.8$25
Top Rival Showdowns for Claude Haiku 4.5
All Matchups
Compare vs:vs GPT-5vs Gemini 3 Provs Grok 4.6vs DeepSeek V4 Provs Qwen 3 Max
Preference LeaderClaude Haiku 4.5 Wins

Claude Haiku 4.5

Δ 178 Arena Elo pts

Throughput LeaderClaude Haiku 4.5 Wins

Claude Haiku 4.5

175 tok/s

Value per Dollar LeaderClaude Haiku 4.5 Wins

Claude Haiku 4.5

$5 / 1M output

Capability Percentiles

Relative percentile scores computed across all active models in the benchmark catalog.

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Leaders Matchup Capability Radar

Comparing top Western standard models with China's leading frontier rival across 6 skill dimensions. Tap any spoke or dot to inspect.

Tap any node to inspect
Percentile 0–100
Head-to-Head Comparison

Overall Matchup Breakdown

Category wins across reasoning intelligence, generation speed, and token cost.

Claude Haiku 4.5 (8)vsGemini 1.5 Pro (1)
Claude Haiku 4.5: 8W (89%)Overall: Claude Haiku 4.5Gemini 1.5 Pro: 1W (11%)
← Claude Haiku 4.51 tiesGemini 1.5 Pro →
🏆Claude Haiku 4.5(5/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Benchmark
Claude Haiku 4.5vsGemini 1.5 Pro
Preference Elo
1,438vs1,260+178
Coding Elo
1,446vs—
SWE-bench
58.2%vs38%+20.2%
LiveBench
62.4%vs49.2%+13.2%
GPQA Diamond
74%vs58%+16%
Claude Haiku 4.5: 5WGemini 1.5 Pro: 0W
🏆Claude Haiku 4.5(2/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Benchmark
Claude Haiku 4.5vsGemini 1.5 Pro
Output speed
175 tok/svs70 tok/s+105 tok/s
Time to first token
95 msvs240 ms+145 ms
Claude Haiku 4.5: 2WGemini 1.5 Pro: 0W
Tied (1-1)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Benchmark
Claude Haiku 4.5vsGemini 1.5 Pro
Output price
$5/1Mvs$5/1M
Input price
$1/1Mvs$1.25/1M+$0.25/1M
Context window
200kvs2M+1.8M
Claude Haiku 4.5: 1WGemini 1.5 Pro: 1W

Side-by-Side Benchmark Matrix

Preference Elo+178
Claude Haiku 4.51,438
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
Gemini 1.5 Pro1,260
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Coding Elo
Claude Haiku 4.51,446
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
Gemini 1.5 Pro—
LiveBench+13.2%
Claude Haiku 4.562.4%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
Gemini 1.5 Pro49.2%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
SWE-bench+20.2%
Claude Haiku 4.558.2%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
Gemini 1.5 Pro38%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
GPQA Diamond+16%
Claude Haiku 4.574%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
Gemini 1.5 Pro58%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Time to first token+145 ms
Claude Haiku 4.595 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
Gemini 1.5 Pro240 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Output speed+105 tok/s
Claude Haiku 4.5175 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
Gemini 1.5 Pro70 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Input price+$0.25/1M
Claude Haiku 4.5$1/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
Gemini 1.5 Pro$1.25/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Output price
Claude Haiku 4.5$5/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
Gemini 1.5 Pro$5/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
Context window+1.8M
Claude Haiku 4.5200k
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
Gemini 1.5 Pro2M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5Gemini 1.5 ProAdvantage Delta
Preference Elo
1,438
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
1,260
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+178
Coding Elo
1,446
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
——
LiveBench
62.4%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
49.2%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+13.2%
SWE-bench
58.2%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
38%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+20.2%
GPQA Diamond
74%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
58%
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+16%
Time to first token
95 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
240 ms
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+145 ms
Output speed
175 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
70 tok/s
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+105 tok/s
Input price
$1/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
$1.25/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+$0.25/1M
Output price
$5/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
$5/1M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
—
Context window
200k
seed-bootstrap · Aug 16, 2026
2M
seed-bootstrap · Aug 1, 2026
+1.8M
Interactive Simulator (USD)

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs in USD (US Dollar).

Save up to 7% with Claude Haiku 4.5
Monthly Volume50M tokens/mo
Quick Presets:
Token Ratio (In vs Out)70% In / 30% Out
RAG / Search (10% out)Coding / Chat (50% out)
Claude Haiku 4.5$110.00 / mo
In: $35Out: $75
Gemini 1.5 Pro$118.75 / mo
In: $43.75Out: $75
Estimated Cost Delta

Claude Haiku 4.5 is estimated to save $8.75/month ($105/year).

Based on 50M tokens (30% gen)

Key Selection Recommendations

  • 1
    Claude Haiku 4.5:Pick Claude Haiku 4.5 when repo-level coding accuracy is the constraint.
  • 2
    Claude Haiku 4.5:Pick Claude Haiku 4.5 when time-to-first-token matters more than peak Elo.
  • 3
    Gemini 1.5 Pro:Pick Gemini 1.5 Pro for million-token RAG or long-document jobs.

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsClaude Haiku 4.5

Higher SWE-bench (58.2%).

High-volume chatClaude Haiku 4.5

Lower output list price ($5/1M).

Voice / low-latency UIClaude Haiku 4.5

Lower TTFT (95 ms).

Long-document RAGGemini 1.5 Pro

Larger window (2M).

Screenshots / visionClaude Haiku 4.5

Both accept images. Defaulting to the higher-Elo side (Claude Haiku 4.5).

Target WorkloadRecommended PickEvaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agentsClaude Haiku 4.5Higher SWE-bench (58.2%).
High-volume chatClaude Haiku 4.5Lower output list price ($5/1M).
Voice / low-latency UIClaude Haiku 4.5Lower TTFT (95 ms).
Long-document RAGGemini 1.5 ProLarger window (2M).
Screenshots / visionClaude Haiku 4.5Both accept images. Defaulting to the higher-Elo side (Claude Haiku 4.5).

Related Editorial Dispatches & Benchmark Notes

View all news
compareAug 16, 2026

Haiku 4.5 vs Llama 4 Scout: cheap Claude versus cheap open Llama

$1/$5 hosted Claude vs a cheap long-context open sibling. The alternative-to-Sonnet pair that is honest.

launchApr 8, 2026

Llama 4 Scout: long-context open sibling of Maverick

Huge window, cheap hosted lists. The Haiku alternative that is actually open-weight.

launchOct 22, 2025

Claude Haiku 4.5 at $1/$5: the cheap Claude people actually ship

Official Anthropic list $1/$5. This is the SKU behind “cheapest Claude alternative” that is still Claude.

Community Sentiment

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

Sign in to cast your verified vote, bookmark models, and participate in benchmark discussions.Sign In to Post

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Social Share Card Preview

Dynamic OpenGraph banner generated at /compare/claude-haiku-4-5-vs-gemini-1-5-pro/opengraph-image

Save PNG

CompareLLM AI Matrix

Verified Head-to-Head Telemetry

LIVE BENCHMARK
VS
Anthropic

Claude Haiku 4.5

Elo 1,438
SWE-bench58.2%
Speed (tok/s)175 tok/s
Input / 1M Tokens$1/1M
Output / 1M Tokens$5/1M
Google

Gemini 1.5 Pro

Elo 1,260
SWE-bench38%
Speed (tok/s)70 tok/s
Input / 1M Tokens$1.25/1M
Output / 1M Tokens$5/1M

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Gemini 1.5 Pro?
Claude Haiku 4.5 has the higher preference Elo in our latest snapshot (1,438). “Better” still depends on coding, price, and latency — see the table.
Which is better at coding, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Gemini 1.5 Pro?
Claude Haiku 4.5 leads SWE-bench at 58.2% vs 38%. SWE-bench is one harness, not your repo.
Which is cheaper to run in production?
Claude Haiku 4.5 output tokens are $5/1M versus $5/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.
Which is faster, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Gemini 1.5 Pro?
Claude Haiku 4.5 has the lower time-to-first-token (95 ms vs 240 ms). Tokens/sec is a separate column if you care about long completions.
Which has the larger context window?
Gemini 1.5 Pro accepts 2M tokens versus 200k.
Can I self-host either model?
Neither model is marked open-weights here. You are comparing hosted APIs.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?
No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?
Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. Claude Haiku 4.5 and Gemini 1.5 Pro Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Related news

  • compare · Aug 16, 2026

    Haiku 4.5 vs Llama 4 Scout: cheap Claude versus cheap open Llama

  • launch · Apr 8, 2026

    Llama 4 Scout: long-context open sibling of Maverick

  • launch · Oct 22, 2025

    Claude Haiku 4.5 at $1/$5: the cheap Claude people actually ship

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All Claude Haiku 4.5 matchups →|All Gemini 1.5 Pro matchups →
Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Claude 3.5 Haiku (previous haiku)Gemini 1.5 Pro vs Gemini 2.5 Pro (next gemini-pro)Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking vs Claude Haiku 4.5Gemini 3 Flash vs Claude Haiku 4.5Gemini 3.6 Flash vs Claude Haiku 4.5Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs Claude Haiku 4.5