CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Live
LeaderboardModelsCompareStacksBest ofGuidesNewsMethod
…
CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Precision Benchmarks

Programmatic, dated AI model benchmarks, head-to-head comparisons, and Stack Engine presets.

Daily ingest · 06:00 UTC

Analytics & Benchmarks

  • AI Model Leaderboard
  • Head-to-Head Compare Hub
  • Models Directory
  • Stack Engine Presets
  • Frontier Models
  • Open Weights Catalog

Guides & Intent Lists

  • Best LLM Lists (2026)
  • Best Coding LLM
  • Best Cheap LLM
  • Fastest Low-Latency LLM
  • Claude vs GPT Benchmark
  • What is Elo?
  • Methodology Guides
  • News & Dispatches

Transparency & API

  • Evaluation Methodology
  • Benchmark Changelog
  • Public JSON API
  • llms.txt Specification
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sign In / Account

© 2026 CompareLLM. Public benchmark data aggregated from Arena Elo, LiveBench, SWE-bench & OpenRouter.

Every score has a dated snapshot.

  1. Home
  2. Comparisons
  3. Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite

Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 16, 2026noindex (thin pair)

Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite benchmark

This page compares Claude Haiku 4.5 (Anthropic) and Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite (Google) using the latest snapshots we have as of Aug 16, 2026. Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite wins on output price at $1.5/1M. Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite has the larger context window (1M tokens). Every cell below is a dated snapshot from a named public source — we do not invent missing scores, and we do not run SWE-bench ourselves.

Quick answer

Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is a dated snapshot, not a lab score. Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is the cheaper output token. Elo is crowd preference, not an exam. Pick the column that matches the job.
Share Analysis:
WhatsAppTelegramX / PostLinkedInReddit

Anthropic

Claude Haiku 4.5

Anthropic cheap/fast Claude SKU. Official Claude Platform list price $1/$5 per 1M tokens (Anthropic Haiku page).

Elo 1,438$5/1M out

Google

Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite

Auto-discovered from OpenRouter (google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite). Preview until a second source matches.

$1.5/1M out

Swap or Add Any Model to this Matchup

Instant pairwise benchmark recalculation across 400+ LLMs

Model A
Model B
Quick vs:vs Claude Opus 4.5vs Claude Opus 4.6vs Claude Sonnet 4.5vs Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Interactive Comparison Diagram

Matchup Breakdown

Tug-of-War Matchup Matrix

Category wins across intelligence, speed, and pricing efficiency.

Claude Haiku 4.5 (7)vsGoogle: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite (3)
Claude Haiku 4.5: 7W (70%)Overall: Claude Haiku 4.5Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 3W (30%)
← Claude Haiku 4.5Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite →
Claude Haiku 4.5 (5/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Preference Elo
1,438vs—
Coding Elo
1,446vs—
SWE-bench
58.2%vs—
LiveBench
62.4%vs—
GPQA Diamond
74%vs—
Claude Haiku 4.5: 5WGoogle: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 0W
Claude Haiku 4.5 (2/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Output speed
175 tok/svs—
Time to first token
95 msvs—
Claude Haiku 4.5: 2WGoogle: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 0W
Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite (3/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Output price
$5/1Mvs$1.5/1M
Input price
$1/1Mvs$0.25/1M
Context window
200kvs1M
Claude Haiku 4.5: 0WGoogle: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 3W
Capability Matchup Radar

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Each spoke is a skill. Farther from the center is better (0–100th percentile). Tap any dot to inspect details.

Tap any node to inspect
Percentile 0–100
Dimensional AdvantageClaude Haiku 4.5 4/6
Preference Elo

No shared data

No shared data

Throughput Speed

No shared data

No shared data

Price Efficiency

Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite

$3.50/1M cheaper

Full Benchmark Score Matrix

—
Elo
High is better
1,438
EloHigh is better
—
Code Elo
High is better
1,446
Code EloHigh is better
—
LiveBench
High is better
62.4%
LiveBenchHigh is better
—
SWE-bench
High is better
58.2%
SWE-benchHigh is better
—
GPQA
High is better
74%
GPQAHigh is better
—
TTFT
Low is better
95 ms
TTFTLow is better
—
Speed
High is better
175 tok/s
SpeedHigh is better
—
In $
Low is better
$1/1M
In $Low is better
$0.25/1M+300%
Out $
Low is better
$5/1M
Out $Low is better
$1.5/1M+233%
Context
High is better
200k
ContextHigh is better
1M+424%
Interactive Simulator

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs based on published $/1M tokens.

Save up to 72% with Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Monthly Volume50M tokens/mo
Quick Presets:
Token Ratio (In vs Out)70% In / 30% Out
RAG / Search (10% out)Coding / Chat (50% out)
Claude Haiku 4.5$110.00 / mo
In: $35.00Out: $75.00
Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite$31.25 / mo
In: $8.75Out: $22.50
Estimated Cost Delta

Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is estimated to save $78.75/month ($945/year).

Based on 50M tokens (30% gen)

Key Selection Recommendations

  • 1
    Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite:Pick Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite when you are optimizing output cost.
  • 2
    Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite:Pick Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite for million-token RAG or long-document jobs.

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsinsufficient data

Need SWE-bench on both sides.

High-volume chatGoogle: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite

Lower output list price ($1.5/1M).

Voice / low-latency UIinsufficient data

Need TTFT on both sides.

Long-document RAGGoogle: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite

Larger window (1M).

Screenshots / visionClaude Haiku 4.5

Claude Haiku 4.5 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Target WorkloadRecommended PickEvaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agentsinsufficient dataNeed SWE-bench on both sides.
High-volume chatGoogle: Gemini 3.1 Flash LiteLower output list price ($1.5/1M).
Voice / low-latency UIinsufficient dataNeed TTFT on both sides.
Long-document RAGGoogle: Gemini 3.1 Flash LiteLarger window (1M).
Screenshots / visionClaude Haiku 4.5Claude Haiku 4.5 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Related Editorial Dispatches & Benchmark Notes

View all news
compareAug 16, 2026

Haiku 4.5 vs Llama 4 Scout: cheap Claude versus cheap open Llama

$1/$5 hosted Claude vs a cheap long-context open sibling. The alternative-to-Sonnet pair that is honest.

launchApr 8, 2026

Llama 4 Scout: long-context open sibling of Maverick

Huge window, cheap hosted lists. The Haiku alternative that is actually open-weight.

launchOct 22, 2025

Claude Haiku 4.5 at $1/$5: the cheap Claude people actually ship

Official Anthropic list $1/$5. This is the SKU behind “cheapest Claude alternative” that is still Claude.

Community Sentiment

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

Sign in to cast your verified vote, bookmark models, and participate in benchmark discussions.Sign In to Post

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Share card

The real PNG is generated at /compare/claude-haiku-4-5-vs-gemini-3-1-flash-lite/opengraph-image for crawlers.

PNG

CompareLLM Matrix

Verified head-to-head card

LIVE
VS
Anthropic

Claude Haiku 4.5

Elo 1,438
LiveBench62.4%
SWE-bench58.2%
Speed175 tok/s
Output cost$5/1M
Google

Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite

Elo n/a
LiveBench—
SWE-bench—
Speed—
Output cost$1.5/1M

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite?
We do not have preference Elo for both models, so we do not declare an overall winner. Compare the metrics that exist.
Which is better at coding, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite?
SWE-bench is missing for at least one model, so we do not rank coding from a single number.
Which is cheaper to run in production?
Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite output tokens are $1.5/1M versus $5/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.
Which is faster, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite?
We do not have TTFT for both models.
Which has the larger context window?
Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite accepts 1M tokens versus 200k.
Can I self-host either model?
Neither model is marked open-weights here. You are comparing hosted APIs.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?
No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?
Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. Claude Haiku 4.5 and Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Related news

  • compare · Aug 16, 2026

    Haiku 4.5 vs Llama 4 Scout: cheap Claude versus cheap open Llama

  • launch · Apr 8, 2026

    Llama 4 Scout: long-context open sibling of Maverick

  • launch · Oct 22, 2025

    Claude Haiku 4.5 at $1/$5: the cheap Claude people actually ship

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All Claude Haiku 4.5 matchups →|All Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite matchups →
Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Claude 3.5 Haiku (previous haiku)Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking vs Claude Haiku 4.5Gemini 3 Flash vs Claude Haiku 4.5Gemini 3.6 Flash vs Claude Haiku 4.5Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs Claude Haiku 4.5Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Claude Haiku 4.5