CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Live
LeaderboardModelsCompareStacksBest ofGuidesNewsMethod
…
CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Precision Benchmarks

Programmatic, dated AI model benchmarks, head-to-head comparisons, and Stack Engine presets.

Daily ingest · 06:00 UTC

Analytics & Benchmarks

  • AI Model Leaderboard
  • Head-to-Head Compare Hub
  • Models Directory
  • Stack Engine Presets
  • Frontier Models
  • Open Weights Catalog

Guides & Intent Lists

  • Best LLM Lists (2026)
  • Best Coding LLM
  • Best Cheap LLM
  • Fastest Low-Latency LLM
  • Claude vs GPT Benchmark
  • What is Elo?
  • Methodology Guides
  • News & Dispatches

Transparency & API

  • Evaluation Methodology
  • Benchmark Changelog
  • Public JSON API
  • llms.txt Specification
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sign In / Account

© 2026 CompareLLM. Public benchmark data aggregated from Arena Elo, LiveBench, SWE-bench & OpenRouter.

Every score has a dated snapshot.

  1. Home
  2. Comparisons
  3. Claude Opus 4.8 vs Grok 4

Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 16, 2026

Claude Opus 4.8 vs Grok 4 benchmark

This page compares Claude Opus 4.8 (Anthropic) and Grok 4 (xAI) using the latest snapshots we have as of Aug 16, 2026. On preference Elo, Claude Opus 4.8 is ahead by 110 points (1,598 vs 1,488; seed-bootstrap (Aug 16, 2026)). On SWE-bench coding, Claude Opus 4.8 resolves 78.4% versus 58.6% (seed-bootstrap (Aug 16, 2026)). Grok 4 streams faster (98 tok/s) while Grok 4 is the cheaper output token ($15/1M). Claude Opus 4.8 has the larger context window (1M tokens). Every cell below is a dated snapshot from a named public source — we do not invent missing scores, and we do not run SWE-bench ourselves.

Quick answer

Claude Opus 4.8 vs Grok 4 is a dated snapshot, not a lab score. Claude Opus 4.8 leads preference Elo (1,598 vs 1,488). Claude Opus 4.8 leads SWE-bench coding. Grok 4 is the cheaper output token. Elo is crowd preference, not an exam. Pick the column that matches the job.
Share Analysis:
WhatsAppTelegramX / PostLinkedInReddit

Anthropic

Claude Opus 4.8

Prior Opus generation still billed at $5/$25. Kept as a compare baseline against Opus 5.

Elo 1,598$25/1M out

xAI

Grok 4

Previous xAI flagship.

Elo 1,488$15/1M out

Swap or Add Any Model to this Matchup

Instant pairwise benchmark recalculation across 400+ LLMs

Model A
Model B
Quick vs:vs Claude Opus 4.5vs Claude Opus 4.6vs Claude Sonnet 4.5vs Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Interactive Comparison Diagram

Matchup Breakdown

Tug-of-War Matchup Matrix

Category wins across intelligence, speed, and pricing efficiency.

Claude Opus 4.8 (6)vsGrok 4 (4)
Claude Opus 4.8: 6W (60%)Overall: Claude Opus 4.8Grok 4: 4W (40%)
← Claude Opus 4.8Grok 4 →
Claude Opus 4.8 (5/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Preference Elo
1,598vs1,488
Coding Elo
1,604vs—
SWE-bench
78.4%vs58.6%
LiveBench
73.6%vs64.1%
GPQA Diamond
86.2%vs79%
Claude Opus 4.8: 5WGrok 4: 0W
Grok 4 (2/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Output speed
66 tok/svs98 tok/s
Time to first token
330 msvs230 ms
Claude Opus 4.8: 0WGrok 4: 2W
Grok 4 (2/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Output price
$25/1Mvs$15/1M
Input price
$5/1Mvs$3/1M
Context window
1Mvs256k
Claude Opus 4.8: 1WGrok 4: 2W
Capability Matchup Radar

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Each spoke is a skill. Farther from the center is better (0–100th percentile). Tap any dot to inspect details.

Tap any node to inspect
Percentile 0–100
Dimensional AdvantageClaude Opus 4.8 4/6
Preference Elo

Claude Opus 4.8

110 pts advantage

Throughput Speed

Grok 4

32 tok/s faster

Price Efficiency

Grok 4

$10.00/1M cheaper

Full Benchmark Score Matrix

—
Elo
High is better
+7%1,598
EloHigh is better
1,488
Code Elo
High is better
1,604
Code EloHigh is better
—
LiveBench
High is better
+15%73.6%
LiveBenchHigh is better
64.1%
SWE-bench
High is better
+34%78.4%
SWE-benchHigh is better
58.6%
GPQA
High is better
+9%86.2%
GPQAHigh is better
79%
TTFT
Low is better
330 ms
TTFTLow is better
230 ms+43%
Speed
High is better
66 tok/s
SpeedHigh is better
98 tok/s+48%
In $
Low is better
$5/1M
In $Low is better
$3/1M+67%
Out $
Low is better
$25/1M
Out $Low is better
$15/1M+67%
Context
High is better
+291%1M
ContextHigh is better
256k
Interactive Simulator

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs based on published $/1M tokens.

Save up to 40% with Grok 4
Monthly Volume50M tokens/mo
Quick Presets:
Token Ratio (In vs Out)70% In / 30% Out
RAG / Search (10% out)Coding / Chat (50% out)
Claude Opus 4.8$550.00 / mo
In: $175.00Out: $375.00
Grok 4$330.00 / mo
In: $105.00Out: $225.00
Estimated Cost Delta

Grok 4 is estimated to save $220.00/month ($2,640/year).

Based on 50M tokens (30% gen)

Key Selection Recommendations

  • 1
    Claude Opus 4.8:Pick Claude Opus 4.8 when repo-level coding accuracy is the constraint.
  • 2
    Grok 4:Pick Grok 4 when you are optimizing output cost.
  • 3
    Grok 4:Pick Grok 4 when time-to-first-token matters more than peak Elo.

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsClaude Opus 4.8

Higher SWE-bench (78.4%).

High-volume chatGrok 4

Lower output list price ($15/1M).

Voice / low-latency UIGrok 4

Lower TTFT (230 ms).

Long-document RAGClaude Opus 4.8

Larger window (1M).

Screenshots / visionClaude Opus 4.8

Both accept images. Defaulting to the higher-Elo side (Claude Opus 4.8).

Target WorkloadRecommended PickEvaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agentsClaude Opus 4.8Higher SWE-bench (78.4%).
High-volume chatGrok 4Lower output list price ($15/1M).
Voice / low-latency UIGrok 4Lower TTFT (230 ms).
Long-document RAGClaude Opus 4.8Larger window (1M).
Screenshots / visionClaude Opus 4.8Both accept images. Defaulting to the higher-Elo side (Claude Opus 4.8).

Related Editorial Dispatches & Benchmark Notes

View all news
launchJun 20, 2026

Keep Opus 4.8 on the board: a baseline, not a flagship

Opus 4.8 still bills $5/$25. We keep it so Opus 5 vs 4.8 is a real generation delta, not marketing.

launchJul 10, 2025

Grok 4 remains the previous xAI flagship on this catalog

2025-07 row. 4.6 is the buy. We keep 4 so upgrade pairs and old inbound links resolve.

Community Sentiment

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

Sign in to cast your verified vote, bookmark models, and participate in benchmark discussions.Sign In to Post

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Share card

The real PNG is generated at /compare/claude-opus-4-8-vs-grok-4/opengraph-image for crawlers.

PNG

CompareLLM Matrix

Verified head-to-head card

LIVE
VS
Anthropic

Claude Opus 4.8

Elo 1,598
LiveBench73.6%
SWE-bench78.4%
Speed66 tok/s
Output cost$25/1M
xAI

Grok 4

Elo 1,488
LiveBench64.1%
SWE-bench58.6%
Speed98 tok/s
Output cost$15/1M

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, Claude Opus 4.8 or Grok 4?
Claude Opus 4.8 has the higher preference Elo in our latest snapshot (1,598). “Better” still depends on coding, price, and latency — see the table.
Which is better at coding, Claude Opus 4.8 or Grok 4?
Claude Opus 4.8 leads SWE-bench at 78.4% vs 58.6%. SWE-bench is one harness, not your repo.
Which is cheaper to run in production?
Grok 4 output tokens are $15/1M versus $25/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.
Which is faster, Claude Opus 4.8 or Grok 4?
Grok 4 has the lower time-to-first-token (230 ms vs 330 ms). Tokens/sec is a separate column if you care about long completions.
Which has the larger context window?
Claude Opus 4.8 accepts 1M tokens versus 256k.
Can I self-host either model?
Neither model is marked open-weights here. You are comparing hosted APIs.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?
No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?
Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. Claude Opus 4.8 and Grok 4 Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Related news

  • launch · Jun 20, 2026

    Keep Opus 4.8 on the board: a baseline, not a flagship

  • launch · Jul 10, 2025

    Grok 4 remains the previous xAI flagship on this catalog

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All Claude Opus 4.8 matchups →|All Grok 4 matchups →
Claude Opus 4.8 vs Claude Opus 4.6 (previous opus)Claude Opus 4.8 vs Claude Opus 5 (next opus)Grok 4 vs Grok 3 (previous grok)Grok 4 vs Grok 4.6 (next grok)Grok 4.6 vs Claude Opus 4.8Claude Fable 5 vs Claude Opus 4.8