CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Live
LeaderboardModelsCompareStacksBest ofGuidesNewsMethod
…
CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Precision Benchmarks

Programmatic, dated AI model benchmarks, head-to-head comparisons, and Stack Engine presets.

Daily ingest · 06:00 UTC

Analytics & Benchmarks

  • AI Model Leaderboard
  • Head-to-Head Compare Hub
  • Models Directory
  • Stack Engine Presets
  • Frontier Models
  • Open Weights Catalog

Guides & Intent Lists

  • Best LLM Lists (2026)
  • Best Coding LLM
  • Best Cheap LLM
  • Fastest Low-Latency LLM
  • Claude vs GPT Benchmark
  • What is Elo?
  • Methodology Guides
  • News & Dispatches

Transparency & API

  • Evaluation Methodology
  • Benchmark Changelog
  • Public JSON API
  • llms.txt Specification
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sign In / Account

© 2026 CompareLLM. Public benchmark data aggregated from Arena Elo, LiveBench, SWE-bench & OpenRouter.

Every score has a dated snapshot.

  1. Home
  2. Comparisons
  3. Codestral 25.01 vs MiniMax M2.5

Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 16, 2026

Codestral 25.01 vs MiniMax M2.5 benchmark

This page compares Codestral 25.01 (Mistral) and MiniMax M2.5 (MiniMax) using the latest snapshots we have as of Aug 16, 2026. On preference Elo, MiniMax M2.5 is ahead by 158 points (1,478 vs 1,320; seed-bootstrap (Aug 1, 2026)). On SWE-bench coding, MiniMax M2.5 resolves 75.8% versus 51.8% (seed-bootstrap (Aug 1, 2026)). Codestral 25.01 streams faster (148 tok/s) while MiniMax M2.5 is the cheaper output token ($0.9/1M). Codestral 25.01 has the larger context window (256k tokens). Every cell below is a dated snapshot from a named public source — we do not invent missing scores, and we do not run SWE-bench ourselves.

Quick answer

Codestral 25.01 vs MiniMax M2.5 is a dated snapshot, not a lab score. MiniMax M2.5 leads preference Elo (1,478 vs 1,320). MiniMax M2.5 leads SWE-bench coding. MiniMax M2.5 is the cheaper output token. Elo is crowd preference, not an exam. Pick the column that matches the job.
Share Analysis:
WhatsAppTelegramX / PostLinkedInReddit

Mistral

Codestral 25.01

Mistral code-specialist model.

Elo 1,320$0.9/1M out

MiniMax

MiniMax M2.5

MiniMax coding model. Tied near the top of official SWE-bench bash-only in Feb 2026.

Elo 1,478$0.8999999999999999/1M out

Swap or Add Any Model to this Matchup

Instant pairwise benchmark recalculation across 400+ LLMs

Model A
Model B
Quick vs:vs Claude Opus 4.5vs Claude Opus 4.6vs Claude Sonnet 4.5vs Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Interactive Comparison Diagram

Matchup Breakdown

Tug-of-War Matchup Matrix

Category wins across intelligence, speed, and pricing efficiency.

Codestral 25.01 (3)vsMiniMax M2.5 (7)
Codestral 25.01: 3W (30%)Overall: MiniMax M2.5MiniMax M2.5: 7W (70%)
← Codestral 25.01MiniMax M2.5 →
MiniMax M2.5 (5/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Preference Elo
1,320vs1,478
Coding Elo
1,402vs1,536
SWE-bench
51.8%vs75.8%
LiveBench
54%vs64.4%
GPQA Diamond
58.4%vs76.2%
Codestral 25.01: 0WMiniMax M2.5: 5W
Codestral 25.01 (2/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Output speed
148 tok/svs90 tok/s
Time to first token
150 msvs250 ms
Codestral 25.01: 2WMiniMax M2.5: 0W
MiniMax M2.5 (2/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Output price
$0.9/1Mvs$0.9/1M
Input price
$0.3/1Mvs$0.22/1M
Context window
256kvs205k
Codestral 25.01: 1WMiniMax M2.5: 2W
Capability Matchup Radar

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Each spoke is a skill. Farther from the center is better (0–100th percentile). Tap any dot to inspect details.

Tap any node to inspect
Percentile 0–100
Dimensional AdvantageMiniMax M2.5 4/6
Preference Elo

MiniMax M2.5

158 pts advantage

Throughput Speed

Codestral 25.01

58 tok/s faster

Price Efficiency

MiniMax M2.5

$0.00/1M cheaper

Full Benchmark Score Matrix

—
Elo
High is better
1,320
EloHigh is better
1,478+12%
Code Elo
High is better
1,402
Code EloHigh is better
1,536+10%
LiveBench
High is better
54%
LiveBenchHigh is better
64.4%+19%
SWE-bench
High is better
51.8%
SWE-benchHigh is better
75.8%+46%
GPQA
High is better
58.4%
GPQAHigh is better
76.2%+30%
TTFT
Low is better
+67%150 ms
TTFTLow is better
250 ms
Speed
High is better
+64%148 tok/s
SpeedHigh is better
90 tok/s
In $
Low is better
$0.3/1M
In $Low is better
$0.22/1M+36%
Out $
Low is better
$0.9/1M
Out $Low is better
$0.9/1M
Context
High is better
+25%256k
ContextHigh is better
205k
Interactive Simulator

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs based on published $/1M tokens.

Save up to 12% with MiniMax M2.5
Monthly Volume50M tokens/mo
Quick Presets:
Token Ratio (In vs Out)70% In / 30% Out
RAG / Search (10% out)Coding / Chat (50% out)
Codestral 25.01$24.00 / mo
In: $10.50Out: $13.50
MiniMax M2.5$21.20 / mo
In: $7.70Out: $13.50
Estimated Cost Delta

MiniMax M2.5 is estimated to save $2.80/month ($34/year).

Based on 50M tokens (30% gen)

Key Selection Recommendations

  • 1
    MiniMax M2.5:Pick MiniMax M2.5 when repo-level coding accuracy is the constraint.
  • 2
    Codestral 25.01:Pick Codestral 25.01 when time-to-first-token matters more than peak Elo.
  • 3
    MiniMax M2.5:Pick MiniMax M2.5 as the default general assistant.

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsMiniMax M2.5

Higher SWE-bench (75.8%).

High-volume chatMiniMax M2.5

Lower output list price ($0.9/1M).

Voice / low-latency UICodestral 25.01

Lower TTFT (150 ms).

Long-document RAGCodestral 25.01

Larger window (256k).

Screenshots / visionMiniMax M2.5

MiniMax M2.5 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Target WorkloadRecommended PickEvaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agentsMiniMax M2.5Higher SWE-bench (75.8%).
High-volume chatMiniMax M2.5Lower output list price ($0.9/1M).
Voice / low-latency UICodestral 25.01Lower TTFT (150 ms).
Long-document RAGCodestral 25.01Larger window (256k).
Screenshots / visionMiniMax M2.5MiniMax M2.5 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Related Editorial Dispatches & Benchmark Notes

View all news
launchFeb 12, 2026

MiniMax M2.5: the Feb 2026 SWE-bench specialist still on the board

Tied near the top of official SWE-bench bash-only in Feb 2026. Coding lists should still see it.

launchJan 14, 2025

Codestral 25.01: Mistral’s code-specialist row

Jan 2025 code model. Still a valid cheap-coding compare. Not a chatbot.

Community Sentiment

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

Sign in to cast your verified vote, bookmark models, and participate in benchmark discussions.Sign In to Post

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Share card

The real PNG is generated at /compare/codestral-25-vs-minimax-m2-5/opengraph-image for crawlers.

PNG

CompareLLM Matrix

Verified head-to-head card

LIVE
VS
Mistral

Codestral 25.01

Elo 1,320
LiveBench54%
SWE-bench51.8%
Speed148 tok/s
Output cost$0.9/1M
MiniMax

MiniMax M2.5

Elo 1,478
LiveBench64.4%
SWE-bench75.8%
Speed90 tok/s
Output cost$0.9/1M

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, Codestral 25.01 or MiniMax M2.5?
MiniMax M2.5 has the higher preference Elo in our latest snapshot (1,478). “Better” still depends on coding, price, and latency — see the table.
Which is better at coding, Codestral 25.01 or MiniMax M2.5?
MiniMax M2.5 leads SWE-bench at 75.8% vs 51.8%. SWE-bench is one harness, not your repo.
Which is cheaper to run in production?
MiniMax M2.5 output tokens are $0.9/1M versus $0.9/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.
Which is faster, Codestral 25.01 or MiniMax M2.5?
Codestral 25.01 has the lower time-to-first-token (150 ms vs 250 ms). Tokens/sec is a separate column if you care about long completions.
Which has the larger context window?
Codestral 25.01 accepts 256k tokens versus 205k.
Can I self-host either model?
MiniMax M2.5 is marked open-weights in our catalog. The other side is a closed API. Check the provider license before you ship weights.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?
No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?
Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. Codestral 25.01 and MiniMax M2.5 Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Related news

  • launch · Feb 12, 2026

    MiniMax M2.5: the Feb 2026 SWE-bench specialist still on the board

  • launch · Jan 14, 2025

    Codestral 25.01: Mistral’s code-specialist row

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All Codestral 25.01 matchups →|All MiniMax M2.5 matchups →
Codestral 25.01 vs Mistral Large 3 (next mistral)Mistral Large 3 vs MiniMax M2.5Llama 4 Maverick vs MiniMax M2.5Doubao Pro 1.5 vs MiniMax M2.5Yi-Lightning vs MiniMax M2.5Claude Opus 4.5 vs MiniMax M2.5