CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Live
LeaderboardModelsCompareStacksBest ofGuidesNewsMethod
…
CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Precision Benchmarks

Programmatic, dated AI model benchmarks, head-to-head comparisons, and Stack Engine presets.

Daily ingest · 06:00 UTC

Analytics & Benchmarks

  • AI Model Leaderboard
  • Head-to-Head Compare Hub
  • Models Directory
  • Stack Engine Presets
  • Frontier Models
  • Open Weights Catalog

Guides & Intent Lists

  • Best LLM Lists (2026)
  • Best Coding LLM
  • Best Cheap LLM
  • Fastest Low-Latency LLM
  • Claude vs GPT Benchmark
  • What is Elo?
  • Methodology Guides
  • News & Dispatches

Transparency & API

  • Evaluation Methodology
  • Benchmark Changelog
  • Public JSON API
  • llms.txt Specification
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sign In / Account

© 2026 CompareLLM. Public benchmark data aggregated from Arena Elo, LiveBench, SWE-bench & OpenRouter.

Every score has a dated snapshot.

  1. Home
  2. Comparisons
  3. MiniMax M2.5 vs Yi-Lightning

Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 16, 2026

MiniMax M2.5 vs Yi-Lightning benchmark

This page compares MiniMax M2.5 (MiniMax) and Yi-Lightning (01.AI) using the latest snapshots we have as of Aug 16, 2026. On preference Elo, MiniMax M2.5 is ahead by 3 points (1,478 vs 1,475; seed-bootstrap (Aug 1, 2026)). On SWE-bench coding, MiniMax M2.5 resolves 75.8% versus 63.4% (seed-bootstrap (Aug 1, 2026)). Yi-Lightning streams faster (130 tok/s) while Yi-Lightning is the cheaper output token ($0.14/1M). MiniMax M2.5 has the larger context window (205k tokens). Every cell below is a dated snapshot from a named public source — we do not invent missing scores, and we do not run SWE-bench ourselves.

Quick answer

MiniMax M2.5 vs Yi-Lightning is a dated snapshot, not a lab score. MiniMax M2.5 leads preference Elo (1,478 vs 1,475). MiniMax M2.5 leads SWE-bench coding. Yi-Lightning is the cheaper output token. Elo is crowd preference, not an exam. Pick the column that matches the job.
Share Analysis:
WhatsAppTelegramX / PostLinkedInReddit

MiniMax

MiniMax M2.5

MiniMax coding model. Tied near the top of official SWE-bench bash-only in Feb 2026.

Elo 1,478$0.8999999999999999/1M out

01.AI

Yi-Lightning

01.AI ultra-fast reasoning model delivering top LiveBench efficiency.

Elo 1,475$0.14/1M out

Swap or Add Any Model to this Matchup

Instant pairwise benchmark recalculation across 400+ LLMs

Model A
Model B
Quick vs:vs Claude Opus 4.5vs Claude Opus 4.6vs Claude Sonnet 4.5vs Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Interactive Comparison Diagram

Matchup Breakdown

Tug-of-War Matchup Matrix

Category wins across intelligence, speed, and pricing efficiency.

MiniMax M2.5 (4)vsYi-Lightning (6)
MiniMax M2.5: 4W (40%)Overall: Yi-LightningYi-Lightning: 6W (60%)
← MiniMax M2.5Yi-Lightning →
MiniMax M2.5 (3/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Preference Elo
1,478vs1,475
Coding Elo
1,536vs1,480
SWE-bench
75.8%vs63.4%
LiveBench
64.4%vs65%
GPQA Diamond
76.2%vs78%
MiniMax M2.5: 3WYi-Lightning: 2W
Yi-Lightning (2/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Output speed
90 tok/svs130 tok/s
Time to first token
250 msvs150 ms
MiniMax M2.5: 0WYi-Lightning: 2W
Yi-Lightning (2/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Output price
$0.9/1Mvs$0.14/1M
Input price
$0.22/1Mvs$0.14/1M
Context window
205kvs16k
MiniMax M2.5: 1WYi-Lightning: 2W
Capability Matchup Radar

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Each spoke is a skill. Farther from the center is better (0–100th percentile). Tap any dot to inspect details.

Tap any node to inspect
Percentile 0–100
Dimensional AdvantageYi-Lightning 4/6
Preference Elo

MiniMax M2.5

3 pts advantage

Throughput Speed

Yi-Lightning

40 tok/s faster

Price Efficiency

Yi-Lightning

$0.76/1M cheaper

Full Benchmark Score Matrix

—
Elo
High is better
1,478
EloHigh is better
1,475
Code Elo
High is better
+4%1,536
Code EloHigh is better
1,480
LiveBench
High is better
64.4%
LiveBenchHigh is better
65%+1%
SWE-bench
High is better
+20%75.8%
SWE-benchHigh is better
63.4%
GPQA
High is better
76.2%
GPQAHigh is better
78%+2%
TTFT
Low is better
250 ms
TTFTLow is better
150 ms+67%
Speed
High is better
90 tok/s
SpeedHigh is better
130 tok/s+44%
In $
Low is better
$0.22/1M
In $Low is better
$0.14/1M+57%
Out $
Low is better
$0.9/1M
Out $Low is better
$0.14/1M+543%
Context
High is better
+1150%205k
ContextHigh is better
16k
Interactive Simulator

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs based on published $/1M tokens.

Save up to 67% with Yi-Lightning
Monthly Volume50M tokens/mo
Quick Presets:
Token Ratio (In vs Out)70% In / 30% Out
RAG / Search (10% out)Coding / Chat (50% out)
MiniMax M2.5$21.20 / mo
In: $7.70Out: $13.50
Yi-Lightning$7.00 / mo
In: $4.90Out: $2.10
Estimated Cost Delta

Yi-Lightning is estimated to save $14.20/month ($170/year).

Based on 50M tokens (30% gen)

Key Selection Recommendations

  • 1
    MiniMax M2.5:Pick MiniMax M2.5 when repo-level coding accuracy is the constraint.
  • 2
    Yi-Lightning:Pick Yi-Lightning when you are optimizing output cost.
  • 3
    Yi-Lightning:Pick Yi-Lightning when time-to-first-token matters more than peak Elo.

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsMiniMax M2.5

Higher SWE-bench (75.8%).

High-volume chatYi-Lightning

Lower output list price ($0.14/1M).

Voice / low-latency UIYi-Lightning

Lower TTFT (150 ms).

Long-document RAGMiniMax M2.5

Larger window (205k).

Screenshots / visionMiniMax M2.5

MiniMax M2.5 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Target WorkloadRecommended PickEvaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agentsMiniMax M2.5Higher SWE-bench (75.8%).
High-volume chatYi-LightningLower output list price ($0.14/1M).
Voice / low-latency UIYi-LightningLower TTFT (150 ms).
Long-document RAGMiniMax M2.5Larger window (205k).
Screenshots / visionMiniMax M2.5MiniMax M2.5 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Related Editorial Dispatches & Benchmark Notes

View all news
launchFeb 12, 2026

MiniMax M2.5: the Feb 2026 SWE-bench specialist still on the board

Tied near the top of official SWE-bench bash-only in Feb 2026. Coding lists should still see it.

Community Sentiment

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

Sign in to cast your verified vote, bookmark models, and participate in benchmark discussions.Sign In to Post

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Share card

The real PNG is generated at /compare/minimax-m2-5-vs-yi-lightning/opengraph-image for crawlers.

PNG

CompareLLM Matrix

Verified head-to-head card

LIVE
VS
MiniMax

MiniMax M2.5

Elo 1,478
LiveBench64.4%
SWE-bench75.8%
Speed90 tok/s
Output cost$0.9/1M
01.AI

Yi-Lightning

Elo 1,475
LiveBench65%
SWE-bench63.4%
Speed130 tok/s
Output cost$0.14/1M

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, MiniMax M2.5 or Yi-Lightning?
MiniMax M2.5 has the higher preference Elo in our latest snapshot (1,478). “Better” still depends on coding, price, and latency — see the table.
Which is better at coding, MiniMax M2.5 or Yi-Lightning?
MiniMax M2.5 leads SWE-bench at 75.8% vs 63.4%. SWE-bench is one harness, not your repo.
Which is cheaper to run in production?
Yi-Lightning output tokens are $0.14/1M versus $0.9/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.
Which is faster, MiniMax M2.5 or Yi-Lightning?
Yi-Lightning has the lower time-to-first-token (150 ms vs 250 ms). Tokens/sec is a separate column if you care about long completions.
Which has the larger context window?
MiniMax M2.5 accepts 205k tokens versus 16k.
Can I self-host either model?
MiniMax M2.5 is marked open-weights in our catalog. The other side is a closed API. Check the provider license before you ship weights.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?
No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?
Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. MiniMax M2.5 and Yi-Lightning Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Related news

  • launch · Feb 12, 2026

    MiniMax M2.5: the Feb 2026 SWE-bench specialist still on the board

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All MiniMax M2.5 matchups →|All Yi-Lightning matchups →
Yi-Lightning vs Yi-Large (previous other)Yi-Lightning vs Ernie 4.5 Turbo (next other)Doubao Pro 1.5 vs Yi-LightningLlama 4 Maverick vs Yi-LightningGemini 2.0 Flash Thinking vs MiniMax M2.5DeepSeek V4 Flash vs MiniMax M2.5