CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Live
LeaderboardModelsCompareStacksBest ofGuidesNewsMethod
…
CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Precision Benchmarks

Programmatic, dated AI model benchmarks, head-to-head comparisons, and Stack Engine presets.

Daily ingest · 06:00 UTC

Analytics & Benchmarks

  • AI Model Leaderboard
  • Head-to-Head Compare Hub
  • Models Directory
  • Stack Engine Presets
  • Frontier Models
  • Open Weights Catalog

Guides & Intent Lists

  • Best LLM Lists (2026)
  • Best Coding LLM
  • Best Cheap LLM
  • Fastest Low-Latency LLM
  • Claude vs GPT Benchmark
  • What is Elo?
  • Methodology Guides
  • News & Dispatches

Transparency & API

  • Evaluation Methodology
  • Benchmark Changelog
  • Public JSON API
  • llms.txt Specification
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sign In / Account

© 2026 CompareLLM. Public benchmark data aggregated from Arena Elo, LiveBench, SWE-bench & OpenRouter.

Every score has a dated snapshot.

  1. Home
  2. Comparisons
  3. GPT-5.6 Sol vs MiniMax M2.5

Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 16, 2026

GPT-5.6 Sol vs MiniMax M2.5 benchmark

This page compares GPT-5.6 Sol (OpenAI) and MiniMax M2.5 (MiniMax) using the latest snapshots we have as of Aug 16, 2026. On preference Elo, GPT-5.6 Sol is ahead by 130 points (1,608 vs 1,478; seed-bootstrap (Aug 16, 2026)). On SWE-bench coding, GPT-5.6 Sol resolves 77.6% versus 75.8% (seed-bootstrap (Aug 16, 2026)). MiniMax M2.5 streams faster (90 tok/s) while MiniMax M2.5 is the cheaper output token ($0.9/1M). GPT-5.6 Sol has the larger context window (1.1M tokens). Every cell below is a dated snapshot from a named public source — we do not invent missing scores, and we do not run SWE-bench ourselves.

Quick answer

GPT-5.6 Sol vs MiniMax M2.5 is a dated snapshot, not a lab score. GPT-5.6 Sol leads preference Elo (1,608 vs 1,478). GPT-5.6 Sol leads SWE-bench coding. MiniMax M2.5 is the cheaper output token. Elo is crowd preference, not an exam. Pick the column that matches the job.
Share Analysis:
WhatsAppTelegramX / PostLinkedInReddit

OpenAI

GPT-5.6 Sol

OpenAI 5.6 flagship tier. Official API $5/$30 per 1M tokens (OpenAI pricing, Jul 30 2026 update left Sol unchanged).

Elo 1,608$30/1M out

MiniMax

MiniMax M2.5

MiniMax coding model. Tied near the top of official SWE-bench bash-only in Feb 2026.

Elo 1,478$0.8999999999999999/1M out

Swap or Add Any Model to this Matchup

Instant pairwise benchmark recalculation across 400+ LLMs

Model A
Model B
Quick vs:vs Claude Opus 4.5vs Claude Opus 4.6vs Claude Sonnet 4.5vs Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Interactive Comparison Diagram

Matchup Breakdown

Tug-of-War Matchup Matrix

Category wins across intelligence, speed, and pricing efficiency.

GPT-5.6 Sol (6)vsMiniMax M2.5 (4)
GPT-5.6 Sol: 6W (60%)Overall: GPT-5.6 SolMiniMax M2.5: 4W (40%)
← GPT-5.6 SolMiniMax M2.5 →
GPT-5.6 Sol (5/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Preference Elo
1,608vs1,478
Coding Elo
1,602vs1,536
SWE-bench
77.6%vs75.8%
LiveBench
73.9%vs64.4%
GPQA Diamond
86.8%vs76.2%
GPT-5.6 Sol: 5WMiniMax M2.5: 0W
MiniMax M2.5 (2/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Output speed
84 tok/svs90 tok/s
Time to first token
270 msvs250 ms
GPT-5.6 Sol: 0WMiniMax M2.5: 2W
MiniMax M2.5 (2/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Output price
$30/1Mvs$0.9/1M
Input price
$5/1Mvs$0.22/1M
Context window
1.1Mvs205k
GPT-5.6 Sol: 1WMiniMax M2.5: 2W
Capability Matchup Radar

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Each spoke is a skill. Farther from the center is better (0–100th percentile). Tap any dot to inspect details.

Tap any node to inspect
Percentile 0–100
Dimensional AdvantageGPT-5.6 Sol 4/6
Preference Elo

GPT-5.6 Sol

130 pts advantage

Throughput Speed

MiniMax M2.5

6 tok/s faster

Price Efficiency

MiniMax M2.5

$29.10/1M cheaper

Full Benchmark Score Matrix

—
Elo
High is better
+9%1,608
EloHigh is better
1,478
Code Elo
High is better
+4%1,602
Code EloHigh is better
1,536
LiveBench
High is better
+15%73.9%
LiveBenchHigh is better
64.4%
SWE-bench
High is better
+2%77.6%
SWE-benchHigh is better
75.8%
GPQA
High is better
+14%86.8%
GPQAHigh is better
76.2%
TTFT
Low is better
270 ms
TTFTLow is better
250 ms+8%
Speed
High is better
84 tok/s
SpeedHigh is better
90 tok/s+7%
In $
Low is better
$5/1M
In $Low is better
$0.22/1M+2173%
Out $
Low is better
$30/1M
Out $Low is better
$0.9/1M+3233%
Context
High is better
+413%1.1M
ContextHigh is better
205k
Interactive Simulator

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs based on published $/1M tokens.

Save up to 97% with MiniMax M2.5
Monthly Volume50M tokens/mo
Quick Presets:
Token Ratio (In vs Out)70% In / 30% Out
RAG / Search (10% out)Coding / Chat (50% out)
GPT-5.6 Sol$625.00 / mo
In: $175.00Out: $450.00
MiniMax M2.5$21.20 / mo
In: $7.70Out: $13.50
Estimated Cost Delta

MiniMax M2.5 is estimated to save $603.80/month ($7,246/year).

Based on 50M tokens (30% gen)

Key Selection Recommendations

  • 1
    GPT-5.6 Sol:Pick GPT-5.6 Sol when repo-level coding accuracy is the constraint.
  • 2
    MiniMax M2.5:Pick MiniMax M2.5 when you are optimizing output cost.
  • 3
    MiniMax M2.5:Pick MiniMax M2.5 when time-to-first-token matters more than peak Elo.

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsGPT-5.6 Sol

Higher SWE-bench (77.6%).

High-volume chatMiniMax M2.5

Lower output list price ($0.9/1M).

Voice / low-latency UIMiniMax M2.5

Lower TTFT (250 ms).

Long-document RAGGPT-5.6 Sol

Larger window (1.1M).

Screenshots / visionGPT-5.6 Sol

GPT-5.6 Sol is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Target WorkloadRecommended PickEvaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agentsGPT-5.6 SolHigher SWE-bench (77.6%).
High-volume chatMiniMax M2.5Lower output list price ($0.9/1M).
Voice / low-latency UIMiniMax M2.5Lower TTFT (250 ms).
Long-document RAGGPT-5.6 SolLarger window (1.1M).
Screenshots / visionGPT-5.6 SolGPT-5.6 Sol is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Related Editorial Dispatches & Benchmark Notes

View all news
compareAug 12, 2026

Grok vs ChatGPT: price and Elo, not a personality contest

Brand hub remaps to top xAI vs top OpenAI. After Aug 12 that is Grok 4.6 vs Sol.

compareJul 24, 2026

Claude vs GPT benchmark: this hub always remaps to the current Elo leaders

Not a frozen 2025 article. Today that is usually Opus 5 vs GPT-5.6 Sol. Dated cells, not a brand fight.

compareJul 16, 2026

Gemini vs GPT: long context versus the OpenAI flagship invoice

Hub remaps to top Google vs top OpenAI Elo. Usually 3.6 Pro vs Sol. Window vs price is the plot.

launchJul 9, 2026

GPT-5.6 Sol: OpenAI’s $5/$30 flagship tier on this leaderboard

Jul 9 2026 family; Jul 30 price update left Sol unchanged. This is the GPT side of Claude vs GPT.

Community Sentiment

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

Sign in to cast your verified vote, bookmark models, and participate in benchmark discussions.Sign In to Post

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Share card

The real PNG is generated at /compare/gpt-5-6-sol-vs-minimax-m2-5/opengraph-image for crawlers.

PNG

CompareLLM Matrix

Verified head-to-head card

LIVE
VS
OpenAI

GPT-5.6 Sol

Elo 1,608
LiveBench73.9%
SWE-bench77.6%
Speed84 tok/s
Output cost$30/1M
MiniMax

MiniMax M2.5

Elo 1,478
LiveBench64.4%
SWE-bench75.8%
Speed90 tok/s
Output cost$0.9/1M

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, GPT-5.6 Sol or MiniMax M2.5?
GPT-5.6 Sol has the higher preference Elo in our latest snapshot (1,608). “Better” still depends on coding, price, and latency — see the table.
Which is better at coding, GPT-5.6 Sol or MiniMax M2.5?
GPT-5.6 Sol leads SWE-bench at 77.6% vs 75.8%. SWE-bench is one harness, not your repo.
Which is cheaper to run in production?
MiniMax M2.5 output tokens are $0.9/1M versus $30/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.
Which is faster, GPT-5.6 Sol or MiniMax M2.5?
MiniMax M2.5 has the lower time-to-first-token (250 ms vs 270 ms). Tokens/sec is a separate column if you care about long completions.
Which has the larger context window?
GPT-5.6 Sol accepts 1.1M tokens versus 205k.
Can I self-host either model?
MiniMax M2.5 is marked open-weights in our catalog. The other side is a closed API. Check the provider license before you ship weights.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?
No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?
Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. GPT-5.6 Sol and MiniMax M2.5 Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Related news

  • compare · Aug 12, 2026

    Grok vs ChatGPT: price and Elo, not a personality contest

  • compare · Jul 24, 2026

    Claude vs GPT benchmark: this hub always remaps to the current Elo leaders

  • compare · Jul 16, 2026

    Gemini vs GPT: long context versus the OpenAI flagship invoice

  • launch · Jul 9, 2026

    GPT-5.6 Sol: OpenAI’s $5/$30 flagship tier on this leaderboard

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All GPT-5.6 Sol matchups →|All MiniMax M2.5 matchups →
GPT-5.6 Sol vs GPT-5 (previous gpt-flagship)GPT-5.6 Terra vs GPT-5.6 SolGPT-4.5 Orion vs MiniMax M2.5OpenAI: o3 Mini vs GPT-5.6 SolClaude Fable 5 vs GPT-5.6 SolClaude Opus 4.8 vs GPT-5.6 Sol