CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Live
LeaderboardModelsCompareStacksBest ofGuidesNewsMethod
…
CompareLLM
CompareLLM.ai
Precision Benchmarks

Programmatic, dated AI model benchmarks, head-to-head comparisons, and Stack Engine presets.

Daily ingest · 06:00 UTC

Analytics & Benchmarks

  • AI Model Leaderboard
  • Head-to-Head Compare Hub
  • Models Directory
  • Stack Engine Presets
  • Frontier Models
  • Open Weights Catalog

Guides & Intent Lists

  • Best LLM Lists (2026)
  • Best Coding LLM
  • Best Cheap LLM
  • Fastest Low-Latency LLM
  • Claude vs GPT Benchmark
  • What is Elo?
  • Methodology Guides
  • News & Dispatches

Transparency & API

  • Evaluation Methodology
  • Benchmark Changelog
  • Public JSON API
  • llms.txt Specification
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sign In / Account

© 2026 CompareLLM. Public benchmark data aggregated from Arena Elo, LiveBench, SWE-bench & OpenRouter.

Every score has a dated snapshot.

  1. Home
  2. Comparisons
  3. Claude Opus 4.8 vs MiniMax M2.5

Pairwise benchmark snapshot · Aug 16, 2026

Claude Opus 4.8 vs MiniMax M2.5 benchmark

This page compares Claude Opus 4.8 (Anthropic) and MiniMax M2.5 (MiniMax) using the latest snapshots we have as of Aug 16, 2026. On preference Elo, Claude Opus 4.8 is ahead by 120 points (1,598 vs 1,478; seed-bootstrap (Aug 16, 2026)). On SWE-bench coding, Claude Opus 4.8 resolves 78.4% versus 75.8% (seed-bootstrap (Aug 16, 2026)). MiniMax M2.5 streams faster (90 tok/s) while MiniMax M2.5 is the cheaper output token ($0.9/1M). Claude Opus 4.8 has the larger context window (1M tokens). Every cell below is a dated snapshot from a named public source — we do not invent missing scores, and we do not run SWE-bench ourselves.

Quick answer

Claude Opus 4.8 vs MiniMax M2.5 is a dated snapshot, not a lab score. Claude Opus 4.8 leads preference Elo (1,598 vs 1,478). Claude Opus 4.8 leads SWE-bench coding. MiniMax M2.5 is the cheaper output token. Elo is crowd preference, not an exam. Pick the column that matches the job.
Share Analysis:
WhatsAppTelegramX / PostLinkedInReddit

Anthropic

Claude Opus 4.8

Prior Opus generation still billed at $5/$25. Kept as a compare baseline against Opus 5.

Elo 1,598$25/1M out

MiniMax

MiniMax M2.5

MiniMax coding model. Tied near the top of official SWE-bench bash-only in Feb 2026.

Elo 1,478$0.8999999999999999/1M out

Swap or Add Any Model to this Matchup

Instant pairwise benchmark recalculation across 400+ LLMs

Model A
Model B
Quick vs:vs Claude Opus 4.5vs Claude Opus 4.6vs Claude Sonnet 4.5vs Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Interactive Comparison Diagram

Matchup Breakdown

Tug-of-War Matchup Matrix

Category wins across intelligence, speed, and pricing efficiency.

Claude Opus 4.8 (6)vsMiniMax M2.5 (4)
Claude Opus 4.8: 6W (60%)Overall: Claude Opus 4.8MiniMax M2.5: 4W (40%)
← Claude Opus 4.8MiniMax M2.5 →
Claude Opus 4.8 (5/5)

Intelligence & Reasoning

Preference Elo, Coding proficiency, SWE-bench & LiveBench accuracy

Preference Elo
1,598vs1,478
Coding Elo
1,604vs1,536
SWE-bench
78.4%vs75.8%
LiveBench
73.6%vs64.4%
GPQA Diamond
86.2%vs76.2%
Claude Opus 4.8: 5WMiniMax M2.5: 0W
MiniMax M2.5 (2/2)

Speed & Latency

Generation throughput and time to first token responsiveness

Output speed
66 tok/svs90 tok/s
Time to first token
330 msvs250 ms
Claude Opus 4.8: 0WMiniMax M2.5: 2W
MiniMax M2.5 (2/3)

Pricing & Capacity

Cost per million tokens and max context window length

Output price
$25/1Mvs$0.9/1M
Input price
$5/1Mvs$0.22/1M
Context window
1Mvs205k
Claude Opus 4.8: 1WMiniMax M2.5: 2W
Capability Matchup Radar

Multi-Dimensional Capability Radar

Each spoke is a skill. Farther from the center is better (0–100th percentile). Tap any dot to inspect details.

Tap any node to inspect
Percentile 0–100
Dimensional AdvantageClaude Opus 4.8 4/6
Preference Elo

Claude Opus 4.8

120 pts advantage

Throughput Speed

MiniMax M2.5

24 tok/s faster

Price Efficiency

MiniMax M2.5

$24.10/1M cheaper

Full Benchmark Score Matrix

—
Elo
High is better
+8%1,598
EloHigh is better
1,478
Code Elo
High is better
+4%1,604
Code EloHigh is better
1,536
LiveBench
High is better
+14%73.6%
LiveBenchHigh is better
64.4%
SWE-bench
High is better
+3%78.4%
SWE-benchHigh is better
75.8%
GPQA
High is better
+13%86.2%
GPQAHigh is better
76.2%
TTFT
Low is better
330 ms
TTFTLow is better
250 ms+32%
Speed
High is better
66 tok/s
SpeedHigh is better
90 tok/s+36%
In $
Low is better
$5/1M
In $Low is better
$0.22/1M+2173%
Out $
Low is better
$25/1M
Out $Low is better
$0.9/1M+2678%
Context
High is better
+388%1M
ContextHigh is better
205k
Interactive Simulator

Workload Cost & Savings Calculator

Simulate monthly production API costs based on published $/1M tokens.

Save up to 96% with MiniMax M2.5
Monthly Volume50M tokens/mo
Quick Presets:
Token Ratio (In vs Out)70% In / 30% Out
RAG / Search (10% out)Coding / Chat (50% out)
Claude Opus 4.8$550.00 / mo
In: $175.00Out: $375.00
MiniMax M2.5$21.20 / mo
In: $7.70Out: $13.50
Estimated Cost Delta

MiniMax M2.5 is estimated to save $528.80/month ($6,346/year).

Based on 50M tokens (30% gen)

Key Selection Recommendations

  • 1
    Claude Opus 4.8:Pick Claude Opus 4.8 when repo-level coding accuracy is the constraint.
  • 2
    MiniMax M2.5:Pick MiniMax M2.5 when you are optimizing output cost.
  • 3
    MiniMax M2.5:Pick MiniMax M2.5 when time-to-first-token matters more than peak Elo.

Recommended Workload Routing

Repo / coding agentsClaude Opus 4.8

Higher SWE-bench (78.4%).

High-volume chatMiniMax M2.5

Lower output list price ($0.9/1M).

Voice / low-latency UIMiniMax M2.5

Lower TTFT (250 ms).

Long-document RAGClaude Opus 4.8

Larger window (1M).

Screenshots / visionClaude Opus 4.8

Claude Opus 4.8 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Target WorkloadRecommended PickEvaluation Rationale
Repo / coding agentsClaude Opus 4.8Higher SWE-bench (78.4%).
High-volume chatMiniMax M2.5Lower output list price ($0.9/1M).
Voice / low-latency UIMiniMax M2.5Lower TTFT (250 ms).
Long-document RAGClaude Opus 4.8Larger window (1M).
Screenshots / visionClaude Opus 4.8Claude Opus 4.8 is the side marked multimodal in the catalog.

Related Editorial Dispatches & Benchmark Notes

View all news
launchJun 20, 2026

Keep Opus 4.8 on the board: a baseline, not a flagship

Opus 4.8 still bills $5/$25. We keep it so Opus 5 vs 4.8 is a real generation delta, not marketing.

launchFeb 12, 2026

MiniMax M2.5: the Feb 2026 SWE-bench specialist still on the board

Tied near the top of official SWE-bench bash-only in Feb 2026. Coding lists should still see it.

Community Sentiment

Cast Your Matchup Vote

0 total votes

Community Discussions (0)

Sign in to cast your verified vote, bookmark models, and participate in benchmark discussions.Sign In to Post

No comments posted on this matchup yet. Be the first to share an evaluation note!

Share card

The real PNG is generated at /compare/claude-opus-4-8-vs-minimax-m2-5/opengraph-image for crawlers.

PNG

CompareLLM Matrix

Verified head-to-head card

LIVE
VS
Anthropic

Claude Opus 4.8

Elo 1,598
LiveBench73.6%
SWE-bench78.4%
Speed66 tok/s
Output cost$25/1M
MiniMax

MiniMax M2.5

Elo 1,478
LiveBench64.4%
SWE-bench75.8%
Speed90 tok/s
Output cost$0.9/1M

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better overall, Claude Opus 4.8 or MiniMax M2.5?
Claude Opus 4.8 has the higher preference Elo in our latest snapshot (1,598). “Better” still depends on coding, price, and latency — see the table.
Which is better at coding, Claude Opus 4.8 or MiniMax M2.5?
Claude Opus 4.8 leads SWE-bench at 78.4% vs 75.8%. SWE-bench is one harness, not your repo.
Which is cheaper to run in production?
MiniMax M2.5 output tokens are $0.9/1M versus $25/1M. Input prices and retry rates still move the real bill.
Which is faster, Claude Opus 4.8 or MiniMax M2.5?
MiniMax M2.5 has the lower time-to-first-token (250 ms vs 330 ms). Tokens/sec is a separate column if you care about long completions.
Which has the larger context window?
Claude Opus 4.8 accepts 1M tokens versus 205k.
Can I self-host either model?
MiniMax M2.5 is marked open-weights in our catalog. The other side is a closed API. Check the provider license before you ship weights.
Are these scores from CompareLLM’s own evals?
No. V1 aggregates public leaderboards (and optional first-party latency pings). Each cell names its source and date. Read /methodology.
What does preference Elo mean on this page?
Preference Elo is a crowd vote from LMArena / Arena. People see two hidden answers and pick the one they like more. The model that wins more often gets a higher Elo. That means people preferred it — not that it passed a school test. It is not SWE-bench, not accuracy, and not a number we invent. Claude Opus 4.8 and MiniMax M2.5 Elo cells are dated snapshots from the named source — we do not compute Arena ourselves.

Related news

  • launch · Jun 20, 2026

    Keep Opus 4.8 on the board: a baseline, not a flagship

  • launch · Feb 12, 2026

    MiniMax M2.5: the Feb 2026 SWE-bench specialist still on the board

Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons

All Claude Opus 4.8 matchups →|All MiniMax M2.5 matchups →
Claude Opus 4.8 vs Claude Opus 4.6 (previous opus)Claude Opus 4.8 vs Claude Opus 5 (next opus)Claude Fable 5 vs Claude Opus 4.8Claude Opus 4.5 vs Claude Opus 4.8Claude Sonnet 5 vs Claude Opus 4.8Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs MiniMax M2.5